The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Russian NGO, the most fraudulent elections in our history - Breaking news

2024-03-18T14:16:40.244Z

Highlights: Russian NGO, the most fraudulent elections in our history - Breaking news. The independent Russian monitoring group Golos said the presidential election won by Putin with almost 90% of the vote was "the most fraudulent and corrupt" in the country's history. Founded in 2000, Golos is the only Russian electoral monitoring body independent of the authorities. One of its leaders, Grigory Melkonyants, is in prison awaiting trial on what the group says are political charges. Reproduction reserved © Copyright ANSA.


The independent Russian monitoring group Golos said the presidential election won by Putin with almost 90% of the vote was "the most fraudulent and corrupt" in the country's history. (HANDLE)


The independent Russian monitoring group Golos said the presidential election, which Putin won with almost 90% of the vote, was "the most fraudulent and corrupt" in the country's history.

According to Golos, the elections that ended yesterday cannot be considered authentic because "the campaign took place in a situation in which the fundamental articles of the Russian constitution, which guarantee political rights and freedoms, were essentially not in force".

“Never before have we seen a presidential campaign so far from constitutional standards,” the group said in a statement.


    Founded in 2000, Golos is the only Russian electoral monitoring body independent of the authorities.

Labeled a 'foreign agent' in 2013, he was banned from sending observers to polling stations.

One of its leaders, Grigory Melkonyants, is in prison awaiting trial on what the group says are political charges.


Reproduction reserved © Copyright ANSA

Source: ansa

All life articles on 2024-03-18

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.