One of the two psychologists, who also ended up under investigation together with two colleagues and Alessia Pifferi's lawyer for forgery and aiding and abetting in the investigation parallel to the trial of the woman accused of letting her daughter die, was said to have prepared "the relevant protocols with 'scores already entered'" in the administration of the "Wais test" which served, according to the prosecution, to report a serious cognitive deficit of the 38-year-old and to obtain a psychiatric evaluation.
An expert opinion which, in the ongoing trial, established that the accused, when she left her daughter Diana, who was almost a year and a half old, to die of hunger and thirst, was capable of understanding and wanting.
The accusation of forgery and aiding and abetting against the five suspects can be read in the invitation to appear served on the two psychologists, registered in recent weeks.
The interrogation is scheduled for April 4.
One of the two, 44 years old and serving at the San Paolo hospital and in the San Vittore prison, would have taken part in that test, which according to the prosecutor and his consultants could not be carried out and had no scientific value (same considerations as the expert in the trial).
And she would have drawn up, together with the other one (not present at the test), the "report of 3 May 2023".
Report, however, "materially" signed, then, by another of the two professionals already investigated, as emerged in recent months.
A report which, among other things, would also have been modified and revised compared to the "original version", also "'changing' some graphs".
Reproduction reserved © Copyright ANSA