Washington-SANA
LONDON (Reuters) - A leaked email recently revealed that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons had tampered with a report on an alleged chemical attack in Douma in 2018, the American Herald Tribune said on Friday, as the mail exposed the deceptive nature of the organization's report on the alleged attack.
The e-mail reveals the deceptive nature of the report of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons on the alleged attack, pointing out that it is the second of its kind after the first leak that indicates that the report The organization's final did not take into account the assessment of the independent engineering team, which confirms that the explosion in Douma occurred from the ground and not as the report claims that a cylinder was dropped from the air in order to accuse the Syrian army.
Today, we have a second leak, this time an internal e-mail sent by a member of the fact-finding mission on June 22, 2018, to British diplomat Robert Fairweather, who was then chairman of the OPCW, and to his deputy, Amer Shawkat, saying he was He was the only member of the fact-finding mission to read the incomplete report before it was issued, distorting the facts and that "some of the crucial facts that remained in the incomplete version had become something completely different from what was originally drafted."
The newspaper said that the e-mail confirmed that the final version of the report is very misleading and is not supported by facts and highlighted the statements that prove the manipulation of evidence collected during the investigation, models related to chlorine were only bleaches found in homes and that the deliberate identification of chlorine as one possibility to use chemical weapons was deceptive The report also exaggerated that the original draft report discussed in detail the contradiction between the symptoms of the victims after the alleged attack, witnesses said, and video footage showed that the entire section of the draft report was removed in its final release. The amendment was made at the request of the Director-General of the Organization, a position he held at the time of Turkish Ahmet Uzumcu.
The newspaper said that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons did not make any attempt to deny the content of these allegations after the report of engineers arrived at the site WikiLeaks, while the priority was to trace the message, stressing that these facts are devastating to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The findings on the use of chemical weapons in Syria are suspicious even by those who did not consider them suspicious in the first place indicating that uncertainty hangs over all UN agencies that have relied on the OPCW for In particular, the United Nations International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, the arm of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, noted that the Commission is closely linked to the banning organization and both often conceal their sources of information, saying that witnesses have not been identified and there is no indication of how their allegations have been substantiated or identified. Countries where many interviews were conducted outside Syria, although most witnesses were in Turkey.
The paper pointed out that as of January 2018, the aforementioned committee reported 34 incidents of the use of chemical weapons in Syria and did not hold the terrorist groups responsible for any of them, despite the weight of evidence showing the use of these weapons over a long period of time, stressing that All this indicates that no report issued by this body can be considered impartial or objective and confirms the truth of what was published by journalist Seymour Hersh, who prepared a report on this refers to an organized attack by terrorist groups, including the Army of Islam and Ahrar al-Sham. The Syrian army had no last reason As long as chemical weapons.
The newspaper suggested that the victims of the alleged attack in Douma may have been killed for propaganda purposes by the most brutal takfiri groups on earth to blame the Syrian government for the media's quick turn to the incident.
The paper pointed out that it is worth retracting the early responses to the report of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons on Douma, especially that the Syrian government raised a number of questions, but the organization repulsed all indicating that the child Hassan Diab refuted the chemical attack along with 17 witnesses at the organization's headquarters in The Hague in April 2018 Stressing that all of the above leads us to accuse the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons of providing assistance to terrorists and their assistants, "White Helmets", who appear overwhelming evidence that they prepared this attack.
Reem Abu Turabi
