The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

[Prohibited Masked Law] The Appeals Division refuses to suspend the High Court's ruling, the new law will not be used for law enforcement

2019-12-10T08:34:56.116Z


The High Court ruled last month that the Chief Executive ’s use of the “Emergency Law” was “unconstitutional” in the case of “endangering public security”, and the “Malaysian Mask Law” established by her “Emergency Law” was also unconstitutional. After the government formally appealed earlier, it requested the Appellate Division to apply for the law to remain in force or to suspend the decision of the High Court. The appeals court issued a judgment today (10th) and rejected the application of the Department of Justice, which means that the "Malaysian Mask Law" is now invalid and cannot be used for law enforcement.


Social News

Written by: Li Huina

2019-12-10 16:21

Last updated: 2019-12-10 16:30

The High Court ruled last month that the Chief Executive ’s use of the “Emergency Law” was “unconstitutional” in the case of “endangering public security”, and the “Malaysian Mask Law” established by her “Emergency Law” was also unconstitutional. After the government formally appealed earlier, it requested the Appellate Division to apply for the law to remain in force or to suspend the decision of the High Court. The appeals court issued a judgment today (10th) and rejected the application of the Department of Justice, which means that the "Malaysian Mask Law" is now invalid and cannot be used for law enforcement.

Chief Executive Lin Zheng Yue'e, in response to the riots in Hong Kong, continued on October 4 this year, suddenly citing the "Emergency Police" as an excuse, making reference to the "Emergency Law" (Prohibition of Masking Law), which took effect at 0AM the next day This action has drawn opposition from many parties, arguing that its approach is in violation of the Basic Law and has triggered multiple applications for judicial review. The High Court ruled on November 18 that the government had adopted the Emergency Law to enter into the law (Prohibition of Masking Law). It violates the Basic Law, and the Masking Act itself has more restrictions than necessary, and its text is also unconstitutional.

After the High Court ruling was issued, the Department of Justice asked the court to suspend the ruling, but the High Court judge rejected it. The Attorney General formally appealed, and then requested that the execution of the judgment be suspended or that the law still be valid, which has been rejected by the Appellate Division.

[Forbidden Masking Act. Interpretation of Judgment II] The government has a legitimate purpose and must balance citizen protection

[Forbidden Masking Act. Interpretation of the verdict] Endangering the scope of public security, the "Emergency Law" is unconstitutional

Democrats disappointed in ruling unconstitutional appeal court suspends masking law

[Prohibited masking law] Saleswoman involved in wearing a mask, the accused officer deferred, pending a decision of the appeal court

Appeals Tribunal

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2019-12-10

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-07T08:05:51.578Z
News/Politics 2024-03-13T15:52:48.684Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.