The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

[Fugitives Regulations] Is there any other inside story for international experts to leave? Message: Request for preview report rejected

2019-12-11T23:08:02.821Z


The IPCC invited five international experts to set up a task force to help review the conflicts caused by the Anti-Amendment Movement and provide advice to the IPCC. However, there are reports that the International Panel of Experts believes that the IPCC lacks sufficient powers and investigative capabilities and decides to resign. The Chairman of the IPCC, Mr. Liang Dingbang, and the Vice-Chairman, Xie Weizhen, both denied the resignation of the international expert group, saying that the international experts had only assisted the IPCC in writing the report, describing that the phased work had been completed. It is understood that in the international expert group, someone had requested to read the report written by the IPCC, but the members of the IPCC did not think this was appropriate, and the two sides finally failed to reach an agreement, which caused the expert to leave one of the fuses.


Politics

Written by: Shan Banshan

2019-12-12 07:00

Last updated: 2019-12-12 07:00

The IPCC invited five international experts to set up a task force to help review the conflicts caused by the Anti-Amendment Movement and provide advice to the IPCC. However, there are reports that the International Panel of Experts believes that the IPCC lacks sufficient powers and investigative capabilities and decides to resign. The Chairman of the IPCC, Mr. Liang Dingbang, and the Vice-Chairman, Xie Weizhen, both denied the resignation of the international expert group, saying that the international experts had only assisted the IPCC in writing the report, describing that the phased work had been completed.

It is understood that in the international expert group, someone had requested to read the report written by the IPCC, but the members of the IPCC did not think this was appropriate, and the two sides finally failed to reach an agreement, which caused the expert to leave one of the fuses.

According to reports, the international expert group considered that the IPCC lacked sufficient power and investigative capabilities, and decided to resign. (Profile picture / Photo by Zhang Haowei)

According to the Wall Street Journal, the International Panel of Experts stated that the IPCC has limited power to review the anti-revision movement, including failure to call witnesses, etc., believes that the power and independent investigative capabilities of the IPCC are significantly deficient and fail to satisfy Hong Kong citizens Because of their failure to reach a consensus with the IPCC last month, they decided to resign.

The Chairman of the IPCC, Liang Dingbang, and the Vice Chairman, Xie Weizhen, both denied the resignation of the international expert group. Liang Dingbang said that the team's staged work has been completed and believes that they will now withdraw from the work first, which will not affect the progress of the report. Xie Weiyi said that international experts only assisted the IPCC in writing a report, describing that this stage came to an end, so it was "Step aside". Xie Weiyi also pointed out that the opinions submitted by international experts will be reflected in the interim report, the IPCC is working hard to write the interim report, and will continue to maintain close contact with the expert team.

The first report of the IPCC's research scope (interim report) has entered the "final stage" and is expected to be submitted to the Chief Executive before the end of December and around Christmas.

The Chairman of the Supervisory Committee, Liang Dingbang, said that the team's staged work had been completed, and they believed that their withdrawal from the work now would not affect the progress of the report. (Profile picture / Photo by Li Zetong)

Sources revealed that someone in the international expert group had asked to review the Interim Report of the IPCC, but members of the IPCC have reservations about this and believe that it is not consistent.

The news stated that according to the usual practice, the IPCC would take the initiative to look at the expert team two or three days before the report was issued, mainly to review the wording of the report and whether the basic facts were wrong. However, international experts asked for it so early. Obviously, it doesn't stop there. It is about the setting of the report by the police. "This is far beyond the authority of international experts, because their role is only to give opinions on the investigation. How the report is ultimately written, they have no right to beak."

It is reported that international experts were refused to preview the report and they were worried that the content of the report would be too different from their own expectations. If the report was not accepted by the society, they would endorse the report in disguise, which would be unfair to them.

The news estimates that, as the two sides failed to reach an agreement, the final solution was to resolve the issue by "exiting" the international expert group to distance themselves from the police and the police.

IPCC's international expert group withdraws from government statement: All recommendations will be studied

IPCC Chairman Liang Dingbang denies resignation of international experts: exit before completing phased work

Li Jiachao responds to Legislative Council before international experts resign

[Fugitives Regulations] The Panel of the Supervisory and Police Commission resigned, and the FDC urged Lin Zheng to set up an independent investigation committee

[Fugitives Regulations] Xie Weizheng denies the resignation of the IPCC Panel Chen Shuzhuang: Zhe Lin Zheng Yiba

Xie Weizheng Liang Dingbang

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2019-12-11

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.