The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

What the media doesn't say about "impeaching" Trump | Israel today

2019-12-19T20:50:07.109Z


Political-political


A report from a former FBI agent states that the stories of coordination with Russia are a plot, making them indictment of the president's rivals • So how come you haven't heard of it?

  • US President Donald Trump // Photo: Reuters

"The House of Commons ousted President Trump," headlines in Hebrew and English said. As has been the case since Trump broke into political life in the US, this time, too, communication alone and reality alone, or in the words of Pike News Media president, "false news."

Because not only is Trump neither ousted nor ousted, but as time goes on, the horrific allegations made against him, especially in the Russian involvement case in the 2016 election, are becoming a boomerang against his rivals. Just ask James Comey, FBI chief Trump fired and today is trying to repurchase public trust.

The media is silent

This upheaval in the "Russian coordination in elections" case, of course, hardly crosses the news reports in the world or in the country. After all, for those years of communication systems that have pimped out the "Russian coordination" plot, predicting the end of Trump's countless times, it is a little embarrassing to tell now about their failure. But it was a failure and none other than the internal critic of the US judicial system, Michael Horowitz, who describes it.

After prosecutor Robert Mueller ruled a year ago that the Russians did intervene in the 2016 election but Trump had nothing to do with it, the president sought to understand where the plot actually came from. He therefore appointed Horowitz to look into what and why the FBI launched an investigation. His researcher published his conclusions over 400 pages.

Bottom line, Horowitz described how U.S. security officials, the U.S. media and the Clinton campaign have joined hands to bring down Trump. However, "there was no intention of malice, there were omissions," Horowitz ruled. Let's say that even on the Democratic side there are those who believe Horowitz made this big discount to Trump's rivals.

A spiral of falsehood

Briefly, Horowitz revealed that a former FBI esteemed agent, named Christopher Steel, was hired by a Washington, D.C.-based private investigative firm to fund Russian involvement in the 2016 election. And to his employers supplied the goods.

He took many steps forward with negligible pieces of information he had gathered, and reached far-reaching conclusions without factual basis. For example, he was hanged in an obscure trial, said George Papadopoulos, the first detainee in the Russian coordination case, but who was a negligent screw on Trump's team, to justify opening an investigation into espionage. So far this is a legitimate political rivalry.

The trouble was that with the information in his hands, Steele went to both the FBI and the American media. This is how a recurring feed is created between the systems. The reporters who heard Steele privately allegedly received confirmation from information from the USSR. Establishment representatives, headed by FBI Chief James Comey, echoed their suspicions of Trump from the media and quickly relied on Steele's findings as a source of much loot. All of this has also happened under the shock of all America's powerhouses, including the Republican Party, Trump's meteoric rise, and his unimaginable victory. This is how a false spiral was created that swelled to adore General Systems in the US for three years. Today no one disagrees with how things were.

"It looks bad"

"The Horowitz Report makes it clear that multiple news reporting circles in recent years have been incorrect or factually baseless," concludes Rolling Stone commentator Matt Taybi. "If journalists (after their reports turned out to be false - so be) angry, they should be angry "If there is no effort to reverse the misguided coverage, it would appear that some media outlets have been deliberately entangled with problematic ocean flooding. Either way it looks bad, but the second option is even worse," adds Taybi, who is not Trump but a journalist who openly identifies With his Democratic rivals.

Incidentally, Horowitz also states that a report that was published almost at the beginning of the affair of then-Congressman Devin Nanz, and which received ridicule and contempt from the Democrats, the media and the American establishment, was the one that actually reflected reality. There was no coordination between Trump and the Russians, yes There was a sequence of omissions by the FBI, the media and other US centers of power.

So even when we read headlines, "The House of Commons ousted President Trump," it's good to know the truth is the opposite. In this case, this is a showcase that is nothing more than a political show that centers on an attempt by the Democratic Party to oust Trump from his chair to appease the extreme core of its supporters. But here too the wheel is flipping over. Democrats are already paying a toll on public opinion, as the American public does not like the procedure. Two Democrats in general defected to Republicans and another ten voted for Trump and their party. In any case, as we know, the show will end in a few weeks in Trump's victory as the Senate repeals "impeachment." So the headlines as mentioned do not reflect the facts.

And what about Netanyahu?

The last thing left to wonder about is the consequences for us. Will as in the US begin to emerge the truth about the PM's investigations? Will it emerge as in America that hand washing and without breaking the law "a succession of failures and mistakes" is that the media, institutional and political centers of power can feed each other to the point of madness? Most importantly, will power centers like America decide on the question that the voter has to decide on?

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2019-12-19

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-01T05:25:34.633Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z
News/Politics 2024-03-28T05:25:00.011Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.