The debate over the possibility of revoking the choice of millions of citizens and preventing the PM from forming a government is the culmination of the war of the authorities • The High Court has already proved: sometimes the game is addicted • Opinion

• Top President Miriam Naor // Photo: Tzahi Miriam

The rolling of the legal ball over the question of Benjamin Netanyahu's ability to form a government with the indictments he carries is culminating in the split of the political process in Israel. On the one hand, a large public, millions in fact, will probably elect a Likud-led Likud, thereby expressing its confidence in it - even if the president does not eventually impose it on the next government. On the other hand, a small, closed group trying to hijack the democratic process and transfer it to the decision of a limited High Court composition.

We are nearing the climax of the authorities war. Allegedly, the judges' composition foreshadows what may be perceived by the public as an addictive game: animals, Vogelman and waiter. If Netanyahu's decision is to prejudice Netanyahu, there will be no escape from the background investigation of the petition and the decision. In the Orly Ben Ari case, we saw that the Supreme Court already knew in advance that there would be a petition and also what its outcome would be. In the present case, a similar process is very likely to happen when retired President Aaron Barak pulls the strings in his smile.

Without being a juror, one can see that the request that the President of the Supreme Court Esther live to decide in a week's time on Netanyahu's issue as the next government component is premature. There is currently no concrete situation to discuss: the president has not yet imposed the assembly of the government. What the petitioners are asking for is actually that the indictment against Netanyahu be used to remove it from the public domain.

The tyranny of the elite pushing for the legal kidnapping of any democratic process, including the war on terror, is expressed in editorials of the Haaretz newspaper. Last week, Haaretz was seen as hot as a collaborator of the joint Arab list campaign in favor of the leader of the Popular Front terrorist organization Khalida Jarrar. Haaretz "does so in a sadistic tone of an aristocratic school principal in England. In the next few days, the newspaper will probably issue its" directives "to the High Court on the subject of Netanyahu as well. It is hard to tell if the "Haaretz" guidelines do not actually reflect the pre-determined High Court opinion.

But for now, the people. There is a people in Israel. There is a public and in a few days the Likudi part will go to the polls to decide who will lead the Likud in the upcoming elections. The spasm of the legal system - in Israel and in the international arena - seems to only strengthen public support for Netanyahu.

No Supreme Court decision can dictate to President Rivlin whether to impose Netanyahu on the government or not. The title "government corruption" is empty of content and far from being proven by the prime minister. Even in the current indictments, the public has been exposed to the extreme version Most of the charges against Netanyahu do not appear to be deeply impressed.

The irony is that those elite members, including jurists, fought for years to frantically release Marwan Barghouti from prison responsible for a large number of murderous acts of terrorism - to lead the Palestinian Authority. Now they are trying to decide in advance who will lead the State of Israel.