Adv. Boaz Ben Tzur, Effi Nave's Paralquito, sent a letter of complaint to Lahav's offices 433 after reporting a leak of information from cell phones

Adv. Boaz Ben Tzur, Attorney at Law, Former Attorney General Epi Naveh, sent Wednesday a letter of complaint in which he seeks to investigate and ascertain the identity of the allegedly leaked materials in the publication obtained from the phones owned by the private "in execution" Serious Offenses. ”Yesterday, News 13 reported that information from Neve's mobile phones was leaked and held by private sources.

Hadas Stief // Photo: Yossi Seliger

The "sex for appointment" affair, in the center of which Naveh, began to be investigated following the exposure of IDF wave journalist Hadas Steif. Noah claims that his privacy was damaged due to involvement of Stief and other factors in taking his cell phones and illegally infiltrating them. Ben Tzur says that "as much as the cause of the leak is indeed Stiff, as the evidence material as well as common sense teaches, the stronger the competent body will take care of it."

The complaint also claims that despite the explicit prohibition on the order, "it was repeatedly violated, and the content of the phone was leaked despite the fact that Noah had repeatedly warned it."

According to Ben Tzur, in January 2019, Neve contacted the police, stating that criminal activity on this issue is ongoing, and that "Stife still holds the stolen property and talks to various parties about correspondence found on his mobile phones, revealing the secret of many conversations."

In light of this, Advocate Ben Tzur argues, "Noah again demanded that the police act in accordance with its authority, as a person who believes in keeping the law, and will act to clarify and deal with the matter without delay."

Adv. Boaz Ben Tzur // Photo: Yossi Zeliger

He said since then that Naveh has sent police a number of inquiries regarding the non-exhaustion of the investigation into the hacking of mobile phones, as well as the leakage of information from them. "And here, while the scathing investigation into Mr. Nave's complaint seems to be progressing lazily on her, it seems, serious damage has been done - and the contents of the mobile phone have been leaked, time after time, to various causes."

According to Ben Tzur, Neve's mobile phones are then in the hands of the police, and a prohibition order has been issued to them.

In addition, Ben Tzur noted in the complaint that last June, Naveh once again, contacted the police and informed them that a man named Yigal Rambam had uploaded to his Facebook page a video, which included a recording of a personal conversation between him and another that was found on the stolen devices hacked on It was also noted that the ongoing investigation into Naveh's complaint, as well as the lack of criminal justice in Stipe's hitherto, "allow this serious state of affairs and therefore a proper clarification of what is said in this complaint" was requested.

According to Attorney Ben Tzur, the recording publications show "fingerprints" of IDF waves. "Listening to them will hear that one of them has" censored "(by playing" beep ") certain content in the recording content. But it remains to be concluded, through sound logic, who will bother to perform such" censorship "voice censorship. Institutional communication, not a private person whose merits led him to edit this conversation content, "wrote attorney Ben Zion. He cites another publication, this time on Twitter, uploaded by a user named Eran Vered with two other recordings of personal conversations that Naveh had with Others and even censors sound to them.

According to him, Neve subsequently contacted the police with another complaint, and that, at the time of the same repeated complaints, "a representation was made that it was not decided whether or not to grant immunity to Stipe and her partners. However, at this time, and after investigations into the matter have been made available for our reference, we already know that immunity was promised to Stipe and its partners in January 2019. "

Ben Tzur also claims in the letter of complaint that "immunity was conditioned by an explicit statement by Strife that the breakthrough products were not already in her hands. Still, it was decided to shelve the case and honor the same promise of "immunity," despite clear and clear indications conveyed to police, through Naveh's complaints, that Stief did not speak the truth, and continues to hold information, and even leak it to various parties. "

Effie Nave // ​​Photo: Joshua Yosef

Commenting on news release 13, Ben Tzur emphasizes that "the State Attorney's Office announced that it intended to continue holding the Appellant's mobile devices, and a copy of the information on the Appliance has not yet been transmitted to the PM or the Appellant. Accordingly, only two parties were able to leak the Mobile Content: the enforcement authorities or Stief. Because the material was not leaked by the law enforcement agencies, no other interpretation can be found, moreover, in a Globes newspaper publication, the material that was leaked read as follows: "The materials transferred to the folders are systematically arranged by the party holding the phone." And here, as stated by Steif and Rosenberg

They testified to you, Steif distributed the breakout products to folders on disk. "

According to Ben Tzur, it is "an unequivocal view that the factor that leaked the information from the mobile phones is Stief or who on her behalf." He added: "This kind of behavior cannot be reconciled. Stiff solicited to take stolen property, broke it, rummaged it, received immunity from prosecution despite the serious crimes she committed, and at the same time continued to hold and leak the products. All these, to the best of our knowledge, have not been investigated, and all, according to the 'immunity' granted, must have led to her being prosecuted as she lied and violated her statements that the material was not in her hand. "

According to Ben Tzur, "probably Stief still holds the breakthrough products. Stief has been leaking the materials to various sources for months now, and now it was published that all the material was leaked, and in fact - it seems - leaked by her."

These actions, Adv. Ben Tzur, constitute clear criminal offenses, including breach of a publicity injunction issued by the judicial tribunals, and that "possession and leakage of the substance is in itself unlawful, and it establishes" obtaining proceeds obtained in crime "and" possession of property. suspect'".