London-Sana
WikiLeaks website today published four leaked documents from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons excluding the use of chlorine gas in the city of Douma in Damascus countryside, in a new confirmation of the organization's manipulation of the final report on the alleged chemical attack.
WikiLeaks reported in a tweet via his Twitter account that four documents from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons revealed that "toxicologists have ruled out deaths from exposure to chlorine" in Douma.
The site pointed out that one of the documents is the minutes of a meeting from a meeting held on the sixth of June 2018, which included discussions between four employees of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and three toxicologists and one chemist in the field of biological analysis to "seek their advice" regarding "if the symptoms observed were consistent with exposure Of chlorine or other reactive chlorine gas, "and the experts were conclusive in their statements that" there is no correlation between symptoms and exposure to chlorine. "
The website pointed out that another document indicated, based on emails exchanged between members of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, that the senior official of the organization, Sebastian Praha, ordered the withdrawal of the report, which carries the results of a violation of the alleged chemical attack in April 2018, from the organization's archive and delete all its effects.
Wikileaks explained that emails dating back to the 27 and 28 of February include a letter sent by Sebastian Praha and give instructions to remove an engineering report for the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Ian Henderson, "a member of the fact-finding mission team on the alleged attack in Douma" from The archives of the archives of the documents and the removal of all traces of it. Henderson concluded that two of the cylinders found at the site of the alleged attack were placed manually and did not drop from a plane or a helicopter before his findings were deleted from the official final report of the OPCW.
The WikiLeaks website indicated that the third document that it uncovered is “a copy of the email exchanges of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in the period between 20 and 28 August of 2018 to discuss meeting with toxicologists” and that “the fourth document is an e-mail exchange From the end of July 2018, which mentions the OPCW inspectors
The eight who were posted to Douma during the fact-finding mission, "with the exception of one who is a paramedic," should be excluded from discussions about the study.
The WikiLeaks website last month published an email to a member of the alleged attack team accusing the organization of covering up a flaw in the report alleging the use of chlorine in Douma. WikiLeaks reported at the time that the unidentified investigator said in his email that the organization's report "distorted the facts."
The British Daily Mail newspaper also revealed earlier this month new documents proving the OPCW had tampered with the final report on the alleged chemical attack in Douma and made significant changes to field investigators' evidence, noting that a senior official in the organization had ordered the concealment of an important document undermining the allegations broadcast On the Syrian Arab Army's use of chemical weapons.
Syria confirmed by its permanent representative to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, Bassam Al-Sabbagh, last July that the organization's report on allegations of the use of chemists in Douma includes incitement against Syria and lacks credibility, objectivity and distort the facts and that these allegations came because of the Syrian Arab army's victories against terrorism.