The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

[Consumer Committee] Xiaomi wireless vacuum cleaner scores comparable to Dyson V10, cheaper than 2,000

2020-01-15T02:29:27.641Z


The Chinese New Year is approaching, and every family is cleaning up. In recent years, many people have switched to upright vacuum cleaners to clean their homes. The Consumer Council has tested 20 wireless upright vacuum cleaners with prices ranging from RMB 1,398 to the most expensive RMB 6,998. The test results were announced in a new monthly issue of "Select" published today (15). Dyson V11 Absolute and V8 Animal have the highest overall ratings. The former sells for nearly RMB 6,000 each. On the other hand, Xiaomi's Mi Handheld Vacuum Cleaner made in China for 1,599 yuan has an overall rating of 3.5 stars (5 stars). It is the same as Dyson Cyclone V10 Fluffy, which is more than half expensive, and the same as the most expensive Electrolux European-made Pure F9. In addition, the Consumer Council found that the efficiency of the suction head of the vacuum cleaner is very different. To clean the dust on the edges of the wall, the high-clean Karcher VC5 Cordless Premium performs best. The effective vacuum width (27.8 cm) measured is greater than the width of the vacuum cleaner itself ( 26.2 cm) is a little wider, so it gets five points.


Social News

Written by: Lao Minyi Li Enci

2020-01-15 10:17

Last updated: 2020-01-15 10:17

The Chinese New Year is approaching, and every family is cleaning up. In recent years, many people have switched to upright vacuum cleaners to clean their homes. The Consumer Council has tested 20 wireless upright vacuum cleaners with prices ranging from RMB 1,398 to the most expensive RMB 6,998. The test results were announced in a new monthly issue of "Select" published today (15). Dyson V11 Absolute and V8 Animal have the highest overall ratings. The former sells for nearly RMB 6,000 each. On the other hand, Xiaomi's Mi Handheld Vacuum Cleaner made in China for 1,599 yuan has an overall rating of 3.5 stars (5 stars). It is the same as Dyson Cyclone V10 Fluffy, which is more than half expensive, and the same as the most expensive Electrolux European-made Pure F9.

In addition, the Consumer Council found that the efficiency of the suction head of the vacuum cleaner is very different. To clean the dust on the edges of the wall, the high-clean Karcher VC5 Cordless Premium performs best. The effective vacuum width (27.8 cm) measured is greater than the width of the vacuum cleaner itself ( 26.2 cm) is a little wider, so it gets five points.

↓↓ Click below to browse and get 3.5 stars or above wireless vacuum cleaner style ↓↓

+5

+4

+3

Two Dyson products earn 4 stars

The Consumer Council found that Dyson V11 Absolute and V8 Animal had the highest overall scores, with 4 stars (5 stars being the star height). The former performed better on the floor, and the latter performed better on the floor. protruding. The products with the lowest overall scores were Candy CRA22PTG003 (RMB 3,880 per unit) and Tefal TY6756 Dual Force 2in1 (RMB 1,398 per unit) made in the Mainland, which had only 2.5 stars and 2 stars, respectively. Broken performances are not good.

The Xiaomi Mi Handheld Vacuum Cleaner, which is also made in the Mainland, has a good overall performance, with a total rating of 3.5 stars, the same rating as Dyson Cyclone V10 Fluffy, but each price is 1,599 yuan and 3,980 yuan, which means that Mijia products are Dyson products are 2,381 yuan cheaper. Electrolux European Pure F9 made by Electrolux also received 3.5 stars, but each one sold for nearly 7,000 yuan.

Dyson and Xiaomi vacuum cleaner use less than 10 minutes after charging

Comparing the use time (then endurance) of the sample after being fully charged and the endurance of suction during use, the use time of each sample amount ranges from about 7 minutes to 38 minutes. The Consumer Council found that the performance of Tefal TY6756 Dual Force 2in1 is the best, but the three Dyson and Xiaomi upright vacuum cleaners have measured usage times of less than 10 minutes, which may not meet actual needs, so in this score, Only 1.5 points.

Dyson explained that the V8 Animal model has been gradually replaced by the new series. Users can use the vacuum cleaner according to actual needs and use the different models for up to 60 minutes.

In the suction maintenance test, we measured the time required when the sample suction dropped to 90% below its maximum suction, and the change in suction after the sample was operated at the highest setting for 7 minutes. It was also found that Tefal's TY9292 Air Force 360 ​​and Candy CRA22PTG003 used for 7 minutes at the highest setting, and its suction has dropped by more than 7%, so it only scored 1 point.

[Wuhan Pneumonia] The Consumer Council has counted 29 masks, the advantages and disadvantages of 3 models, the efficiency of filtering bacteria is more than 99.9%

[CC] Single-head induction cooker scores $ 349 to $ 699 7 important maintenance tips are often overlooked

[Consumer Committee] 19 types of chocolate have a fat content that is more fat than black chocolate and milk chocolate!

[Consumer Committee] Ikea induction cooker is flat and high, and the family has failed to pass safety standards or caused a trip

The overall quiet performance is not ideal

Regarding the level of tranquility, the Consumer Council found that the overall performance of the sample was not satisfactory, whether it was noise measurement or tester review. The sound pressure level measured 1.6 meters away from the fuselage ranged from 63 dB to 77 dB, which is equivalent to The noise of general conversations or busy city traffic, of which Philips FC6172 PowerPro Duo has the lowest score.

The Consumer Council recommends that if users cannot afford a traditional wired canister vacuum cleaner at home, they can consider using a wireless upright, otherwise the wired canister suction is stronger and the price is relatively low.

Consumer Council Vacuum Cleaner Dyson

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-01-15

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.