Trump's business approach has broken the sacred paradigm that settlements are an obstacle to peace

I write things on the night between Wednesday and Thursday. After Washington's euphoria, there is a sense of sourness in the air. Promise immediate annexation, the right celebrated but now as things are written it turns out that there is no gossip here and we are done. In a state or a scandal or festival, it is enough to soothe the atmosphere and reduce the size of the achievement.

Netanyahu is a leader on a historical scale because he lives history. The Deal of the Century itself is a reflection of Netanyahu's ideas in his book "Place under the Sun". And Netanyahu has the patience of a Bedouin. He understands what the main thing is and what is taken care of along the way. Building and strengthening the power of the State of Israel. In many ways he is much more of Ben-Gurion than Begin.

From the movie "Play Her, Sam" (1972)

What is between November 27 and November 27, 2020? A proposal is again at stake. Like then, even today. Again, dividing the land, again we get the relatively small part (30%), again the Arabs get more than half the glass.

Once again we are happy to be part of it, again the Arabs are kicking the bucket. So it was a land distribution program, today it's a land distribution program. After 53 years, the Americans exchanged floppy disks. We moved from the Auschwitz lines to a completely different game. There is no Clinton outline, no illegal settlements, there is sovereignty, and recognition of our right to land. Justified Israel's existence through the Holocaust. A terrible argument that puts the horrible possibility that we have come to Israel not on us. Trump in his speech talked about the Bible land, the Jewish people's right to its historic homeland.

The script is unimaginable, the US government recognizes Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria. The US president holds a ceremony in the presence of Arab ambassadors. Britain, France, Egypt and Saudi Arabia congratulate. No 1967, no right of return, no land descent to Jordan, annexation, Gaza demilitarization, unified Jerusalem. Clinton outline dead His approach - you touched you, you won't take today, you will lose tomorrow, he has broken the holy paradigm of the State Department, according to which the settlements are an obstacle to peace.

The Israeli left is caught in its infamy. The world welcomes and they try to shake. On the one hand, they say there is a psycho megalomaniac with carrot tan and the agreement will not apply because there is no bride (by the knowledge of the matchmakers, regarding the Palestinian bride, there are two. One of Fatah and the other from Hamas), including those who make agreements over the other's head (the Governor of Japan and Germany after World War II), and on the other hand they sarcastically comment that the Trump program is more leftist than Oslo. If it is indeed a more leftist program than Oslo, why not the left one jumping at it and marry it? Maybe because it does not include deportation of Jews? And if there is no deportation, what is it worth at all?

Here on the right suddenly agree to a Palestinian state, defying the left. So, if the Palestinians meet conditions that include recognition of Israel as the Jewish nation state, no right of return but full demilitarization, no terrestrial origin for Jordan and their capital Abu Dis, then they will have the autonomy they can call it from the sides of the intergalactic empire. Between this and the Palestinian state, according to the Clinton, Barak or Olmert outline, the distance is huge and does not include rocket fire from Qalqiliya on Kfar Saba and Palestinian forces in the Old City.

According to the news, last night Benny Gantz was supposed to reject President Trump's invitation to avoid being a statistic on Netanyahu's show. At the last minute, Gantz was offered a separate meeting with Trump. In the media and at the just-Bibi camp, they quickly celebrated Gantz's evasive maneuver The reality is different. Gantz served Netanyahu because it was not an exercise. Gantz gave a seal to Netanyahu's great strategic move.

Gantz and his camp in politics and the media are the victims of their own propaganda. They are now committed to a plan that includes annexing the area according to the parameters set by Netanyahu.

To understand the events of the week, it is advisable to disengage from propaganda of hatred and see where Netanyahu's political-political work has been going for years, namely to assume that the man is acting out of a mission, to understand what his goals are and to examine the latest events.

Netanyahu entered politics before the terrible Oslo Accord came into being, and since then he has been waging a constant war in the Oslo Concept, which means a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, which Netanyahu rightly sees as the State of Israel's death certificate and Zionist vision. 25 years Netanyahu has been trying to repair the damages of Oslo. That's the big fix.

Netanyahu, throughout his years of leadership, is showing a permanent pattern, ready to make point-blank, upsetting, concessions that are maddening to his base, for one reason only, to maintain the grand strategy of preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

For eight years as prime minister, alongside Obama as US president, Netanyahu has fought a successful braking battle on the Palestinian issue and succeeded in it. In this containment, the construction freeze, for example, was a maneuver for protecting the great strategic interest.

Another example is the battle Netanyahu waged against the Obama administration's approach to Iran and its nuclear program. In the test of failure, the nuclear agreement was signed with the aid of encouraging votes from Israel. Among them, one son of Gantz and one Yair Lapid. But in his stubborn fight, Netanyahu has prepared the ground in the US and Israel for a subsequent upheaval.

With Trump's election , Netanyahu recognized a historic opportunity, and he attacked it vigorously with a massive political offensive. Two issues that he wanted to change fundamentally were discussed: Iran and a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

The Iranian issue is a success - the Trump administration canceled the nuclear deal with Iran and imposed harsh sanctions on it. Israel and the US are currently in a campaign against Iran that is on the defensive. In the Palestinian issue, the goal was a plan with the US to break the Oslo concept of a Palestinian state within the borders of 1967. The century plan met the needs.

It is impossible to know what will happen after the upcoming election, but Netanyahu is acting with a sense of mission and urgency, and it was important to present the centennial plan and present it as a fact as long as Trump is president.

Annexation and application of sovereignty - Who believed that these would be profitable and realistic concepts in Israel in general and in blue and white, the big party of the left? The important fact is that Gantz reached the White House and gave legitimacy to Netanyahu's big strategic move, which was to extract Israel from the Oslo stranglehold. Gantz played his important role in Netanyahu's big strategy.

The important fact is that Gantz came to the White House and played his important small role in Netanyahu's big strategy