The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The debate: human rights of the past and present

2020-02-08T10:58:11.371Z


The rights to health, security and education have become brittle for too long. It is easier to transform vocabulary with spelling cravings than to change reality.


02/08/2020 - 7:01

  • Clarín.com
  • Opinion

There is a social trauma that comes from fear. A threat of "coronavirus" sui generis, of an implacable plague that makes those who do not kneel before the yoke of verticalist creeds become pariahs .

There is a wave, a deep refutational movement, a “watch out for what you are going to say” that we all have within us as an alert that sounds when we speak on issues that we perceive controversial or taken for ourselves by the Paleolithic Kirchnerism that aims to treasure the Truth and only the truth.

There is a patrimonialism of history, an appropriation and an inquisition for those who encourage dissent with the cookbook of what should be thought and said distributed from the puppeteer K.

There is a subtle vassalage that expands an acrobatic style of saying. We train to speak without leaving vulnerable flanks to the dreaded accusation: reactionary! That linguistic and political Damocles sword works and softens massively.

There is self-censorship. It is regressive and inadequate and paralyzes us, but there is.

There is a dogmatism that prescribes how we have to talk, and above all, when and on what topics it is preferable to silence.

Authoritarianism sails into depths poisoned with fear. It springs from an authoritarian historical subsoil, distant from reality and close to the pulpits and political mass.

In Argentina, telling the truth has high costs. A consistent submachine gun is triggered with automatism and militant discipline for those who differ from the official, Christian model of the '70s and their vague circumstances. To state the number registered so far and not only the symbolic of the disappeared, is not to deny the greatest atrocity in Argentine history.

It is all so delusional that, on the contrary, suddenly there is a paradoxical denial of CONADEP's immense work that documented and listed the horrors committed by the State. Therefore, Graciela Fernández Meijide has said that "in Argentina there is no denial on the Dictatorship."

There were and there are sectors, ultras and minorities today, that relativize or even justify the barbarism of the military. They are few fans encapsulated in their madness.

Simultaneously there was and there is denial of the crimes of State of the Triple A, and also of the blood spilled by the ERP and by Montoneros.

A taboo persists there. An interdiction For the metastasis of the '70 are worth more (for many) panegyric than reality. It is all so dynamic, however, that the dogmatic imposition suddenly appeared pierced from the heart of the government. Santiago Cafiero has said that "there are no political prisoners in Argentina." Immediately, Julio De Vido pointed him with his sharp scythe of common places and accused him - when not - of an employee of the United States Embassy.

Simultaneously, the troupe of villain defenders lined up behind the former super operator with a government card.

Elisabeth Gómez Alcorta, the Minister of Women, Gender and Diversity also differed from Cafiero: "I have no doubt that Milagro Sala is a political prisoner," he sentenced and referred to semantic issues and legal gaps.

The scene was completed when Governor Axel Kicillof referred to the "Teachers and Twelve" so that " Never Again be taken as enemies . "

Alberto Fernández was smiling behind him.

It is easier to transform vocabulary with spelling cravings than to change reality.

Beyond all grammatical, ideological, and internal discussions, the rudeness of the economy continues to punish and come from afar. Entering a public hospital despite the skills and efforts of doctors is often an ordeal. Patients do not discuss the past but today, and the immediate future. They wait to cure their ills, and the Byzantinism vanishes into a ridiculous loneliness regarding everyday life.

The rights to health, security and education have become brittle for too long. The experts in appearing progressivism do not solve these problems.

There is a gigantic hypocrisy .

Corruption caused terrible damage . And De Vido is one of the top responsible for these massive exactions. The impunity he claims would only deepen the drama that crime always produces without punishment.

Poverty hits . The remedies become more expensive. Food also despite so many cares and controls.

This is not easy for anyone.

A society does not live on appearances.

Because all appearances are deceiving .

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-02-08

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-09T12:38:43.324Z
Life/Entertain 2024-03-13T11:12:22.885Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.