Blood stains taken by forensics lab in the cell far from the scene of the murder were published in News 13 • The stains contradict Zadorov's reconstruction

Has the vision found Roman Zadorov murdered by Thayer Radha, almost 15 years since the murder that shook the country? This evening (Tuesday), 13 blood stains taken by forensic lab investigators at the scene of the murder were uncovered and hidden, stains that contradict Zadorov's reconstruction during the murder investigation and led to his conviction.

Roman Zadorov's lawyer filed for re-trial // Photo: Ami Shamir

The bloodstains are reported to have been found on a beam in toilet cell number three, which is not the cell in which Radha was murdered and distant - and if the blood is indeed the girl's blood, his presence contradicts the reconstruction performed by Zadorov five days after the murder. Recall, about a year ago, another problematic evidence revealed Thair Radha's blood stains on a toilet paper dispenser in the cell near the murder cell - also in cell number three.

Prof. Boaz Sanjero, of the Law and Business Center and Sapir Academic College, addressed the reconstruction, saying: "Reconstruction in this case is disgraceful. According to the same reconstruction, as presented in court, Zadorov is aided by beams between one cell and two in the bathroom, and between two and three To jump.

More on:

• This is how Zdorov will try to win a retrial

• The prosecutor's office admits: error in the Thair Radha case

Roman Zadorov's attorney will apply for retrial: "There is evidence to change the picture in the case"

As mentioned, in the photos that were first shown tonight, you can see a bloodstain that was not part of Zadorov's escape route on the beam between cell three and cell four. How did blood stain reach the beam between cell three and four? Was it sampled? Who does he belong to? There's no telling. It was not examined and was not included in the investigation file. "

"I return to the first conviction in my district, where the root cause of the error," added Sanjero, "was that he should have been credited based on what was there. Since then, there are more and more signs of his innocence. Obviously he should not have been convicted. Murder and should have been credited to it originally. "