The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Weinstein trial: jury still divided, judge returns to deliberate

2020-02-21T20:29:45.905Z



The Harvey Weinstein trial jury hinted on Friday February 21 that he had agreed to three of the five charges but remained divided over the two remaining, and the judge asked them to continue their deliberations.

Read also: Weinstein's lawyer requests his acquittal, even if "it's unpopular"

In the early afternoon, jurors at the Manhattan Criminal Court sent magistrate James Burke a written question, asking if they could agree on only part of the charges.

The chiefs mentioned on which there would be agreement are those concerning the alleged sexual assault on former production assistant Mimi Haleyi and the rape said to have suffered the aspiring actress Jessica Mann.

The two remaining counts each constitute an aggravating circumstance of "predatory" behavior. These are the most serious, likely to lead to the conviction of Harvey Weinstein to life.

Read also: The Weinstein trial ends in confusion

Justice Burke consulted the prosecution and the defense to find out their position.

The defense of Harvey Weinstein said he was in favor of a partial verdict, but prosecutor Joan Illuzzi-Orbon replied that the prosecution was "not (ready) to accept" this decision "at this stage".

The judge then called the jury back. "I will ask you to continue your deliberations," he told them, after having read them the official text which explains that it is normal for a jury to sometimes have the impression of finding themselves in a dead end.

The magistrate did not answer the jury's question directly and therefore did not tell them whether it was possible to reach a partial verdict, which is however a possibility.

The jury's question was asked on the fourth day of the deliberations, a few minutes before the time scheduled for a suspension until Monday.

Read also: At the Weinstein trial, a witness recounts a blackmail: a threesome against a role

Throughout the week, the jurors demanded that they be re-read several testimonies, mainly those of Mimi Haleyi and actress Annabella Sciorra, who claims to have been raped by Harvey Weinstein during the winter of 1993.

Annabella Sciorra's testimony is crucial because the counts of "predator" include her allegations, to show that the producer had recurrent behavior.

The jurors, on the other hand, did not ask any questions or ask for anything concerning Jessica Mann, who is linked to three counts and whose testimony at the hearing was considerably weakened by the defense.

Harvey Weinstein has always denied any sexual assault, saying it was consensual.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2020-02-21

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-15T13:33:04.801Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.