The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Goldnadel: "The era is a deviation from anti-racism and human rights"

2020-02-24T12:30:34.493Z


FIGAROVOX / TRIBUNE - The lawyer and columnist curls the European Court of Human Rights and SOS Racisme, accusing them of having discredited the fights, however legitimate.


Gilles-William Goldnadel is a lawyer and essayist. Each week, he deciphers the news for FigaroVox. His latest book, Neuroses Medias. The world has become a raging crowd appeared at Plon.

Our ugly era is the deviation of beautiful things.

Initially, the creation at European level of a Court for the defense of human rights was a good thing.

Alas, we had to be disenchanted at the same time that political Europe was a disenchantment.

And many of the decisions of this Court bear the mark of the law of mankind which deviates human rights and of xenophilic multiculturalism which destroys roots and cultures as a kind of political phylloxera.

On the security front, certain outliers that go so far as to prohibit the right of allegedly sovereign states to expel dangerous convicted terrorists, as well as the authorization of Sharia in Greece, encourage some - including the author of these lines - to wish s emancipate from an ideological guardianship that has become a threat to French human rights.

But, in our infinite candor, our critical vision of this court was a thousand miles from realizing that the decisions it made were motivated by more than a more Pavlovian than thoughtful ideology found in some French magistrates.

Reading the works of Grégor Puppinck as well as the very documented dossier of Bastien Lejeune in "Valeurs Actuelles" brought me definitively out of my blameworthy naivety.

Over the past ten years, 10% of the judges of the ECHR were "linked to the network of the Open Society Foundation" by Georges Soros.

For those who don't know, Grégor Puppinck is a French jurist and activist, specialist in human rights and international law. He is notably the director of the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ), a European, Christian and conservative NGO.

In this context, Puppinck conducted in 2019 a meticulous inquiry into the methods of intervention of NGOs before the ECHR and, in particular, into “the relationships maintained between NGOs and its magistrates”… since this court is made up, in a notable proportion former members of NGOs. This rigorous investigation, with supporting documents and figures, clearly establishes that more than 20% of the judges between 2009 and 2019 were former collaborators of "these NGOs strongly active in this court" and that more than 10% of the judges during the same period were "linked to the network of the Open Society Foundation " by Georges Soros, whose financial power and anti-border activism are known.

This month, Gregor Puppinck therefore published an explosive report - or at least which would explode if a media omerta did not bury him under the sand of silence - "on NGOs and judges of the ECHR from 2009 to 2019" . After studying the Court's public data, the author discovered that 22 of the 100 judges who sat during the period had a direct link with 7 NGOs linked to the Open Society of Soros! These 7 NGOs intervened in 188 cases as an applicant, representative or third party.

Even more staggering, in 88 cases, these judges ruled when they had a link with an NGO involved. Only in 12 cases where there was a link between an NGO involved and a judge did the judge decide, in accordance with his duty, to deport himself, thus avoiding an illegal conflict of interest.

If I were an MEP, I would urgently request a commission of inquiry. If I were a lawyer in a case in which a judge in a position of conflict of interest would not have recused himself, I would prosecute him criminally. As a French and European citizen and lawyer, I want even more to flee from a misguided institution.

Ideological and selective anti-racism has diverted the fight against racism.

Anyone who would see in my questioning of Georges Soros the mark of an anti-Semitism that an extreme left with relatively little Judeophile sniffs with an unusual flair, will kindly write to the editors who will transmit.

The fight against racism is also a beautiful thing. Ideological and selective anti-racism has diverted it. SOS Racisme, this week, will have definitely discredited it.

We knew that this generously subsidized association, historically linked to the Socialist Party of which it was a formerly effective satellite before following its downward trajectory, was faithful to its patronymic title since it will have helped the racist phenomenon by exasperating community tensions.

Painting the French of origin in Dupont-la-joie franchouillard and racist while fiercely denying anti-Western and anti-Christian racism or Islamic anti-Semitism will have been his most sadly successful ideological achievements.

In an obsessive setting where the Holocaust was suggested at all costs by the subliminal means of a small yellow hand with a doubtful chromatic taste.

But this week an extra step will have been taken at this deviation.

SOS Racisme has in fact no longer criminalized criticism of illegal immigration or selected racisms, but expressly encouraged them.

We no doubt remember that the humorist and certainly communitarian Yassine Belattar had pursued his aggressiveness during a television program Jean Messiha, member of the National Rally, with heavy emphasis on his Eastern origins. This one is indeed Christian and of Egyptian origin.

SOS Racisme now expressly encourages racism.

It is in this unhealthy setting, that the alleged humorist believed in having to chirp like this: "Jean, my camel, I spoke at the zoo of Thoiry, they are OK so that you make your next meeting with your head ..."

Believing himself to be the victim of racist remarks, Mr. Messiha, not without dubious irony, called to the rescue SOS Racisme et la Licra.

Rather than respond positively or remain silent, here below, and still on Twitter, the end of mocking dismissal from Dominique Sopo, president of SOS Racisme:

“Dear Jean Messiha, I think that Licra will be happy to form with SOS-Racisme in order to put an end to the odious comparison between yourself and a camel. This comparison is disgraceful for camels. ”

Let us note, in passing, that the deputy Laetitia Avia, at the origin of the controversial law which proposes to suppress racist or hate messages on social networks, had fun with Mr Sopo's protrusions.

As if that were not enough, the vice-president of SOS Racisme, Mr. Patrick Klugman, assistant to Mrs. Hidalgo, flew to the aid of both the communitarian and its president: "Jean Messiha complains of racism after being called camel by Bellatar Yacine; except for the interested party to assimilate himself to a camel and to see all the camels amalgamated through him, it is difficult to perceive racism here! Hence the tweet by Dominique Sopo ”.

We would be curious to see the vice-president of SOS Racisme apply his laborious reasoning to Christiane Taubira and to a monkey.

Selective anti-racism, in the face of the customer, is the most cruelly stupid of all deviations.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2020-02-24

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-09T12:07:50.967Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.