Initially, the referral in mid-January of the issue of financial closure of the pension reform to a "conference on the financing and balance of pensions" was unanimously welcomed. This executive decision, after more than a month of strike in transport and repeated demonstration, had a double interest. First, to get out of the trap of the pivotal age in which the government had been locked since the presentation in early December of its bill. And secondly, to give the illusion of an efficient social dialogue with the unions, by giving substance to an idea of the CFDT.
Read also: Pension reform: our file to understand everything
Everything was going well therefore in the best of worlds: the debate, which obscured since the beginning of September the bottom of the reform - namely the implementation of a universal system by distribution by points "simpler, fairer for all" - for the sole benefit of financial constraints, was going to be able to start at the Assembly, in a special committee and then in plenary session. And the real questions about rights
This article is for subscribers only. You have 70% left to discover.
Subscribe: € 1 for 2 months
cancellable at any time
Enter your emailAlready subscribed? Login