Recently there has been a change in the graphics of the block map in surveys published in the media. No more "right-wing bloc" versus "center-left bloc with Israel our house". From now on, the published block map includes the right (Likud-Haredi-right) and the left-center (blue-white-work-Meretz-Bridge), and two independent trackers: the joint list - and Israel in our home.



The conditions created make it clear how Israelis our home is, according to the polls, a party with seven disappearing. Or rather, a party with one big disappearance - double seven. From a party with a more or less recognized ideological identity, Israel has become our home to a party whose political position is unknown. Whoever drops her note in the ballot box puts his voice on the antler.



Before the first day, she was also seen as an integral part of a Netanyahu-led coalition - but she did not. On Monday, Lieberman made sure the party was somewhere between the blocs - but in the end he did not join any of them. Now that he does not rule out a meeting with Meretz, but does not rule out a meeting with the ultra-Orthodox factions, his words can be interpreted as a clear tendency for the center-left bloc.



Right-wing voters, left-wing voters, and those who are important to religion and state - will be mistaken if they vote for Israel in our home on the basis of their ideological identity. Because as mentioned, this is a disappearing party.



The party list is the best proof. At the time, the late David Dudu Rotem, who served as the constitutional committee chairman on behalf of the Israel Beitinu faction, conceived, initiated and promoted the outline of the recruitment law. As a resident of Efrat and former attorney general of the Yesha Council, Rotem had a clear and sharp agenda , And in the party remember and often remind him of the good.



What was more natural to Lieberman, by incorporating into our list our home a national religious candidate, in the ideological tone of David Rotem? Why, in the current political reality, when all parties are repatriating the religious-national voice, Israel our home gives up knit domes wearers? This is of double benefit: it will also bring votes from the sector and also purge the party of its anti-religious image. All of Lieberman's attempts to explain that there is no problem with religious Zionism, but only with its radical faction, are destined for failure - as long as the composition of his list proves the opposite.



The reason is simple. Lieberman wants to put a disciplined and obedient faction into the Knesset, whose members will be ready to change their path as soon as they are required. An opinionated candidate with an ideological backbone from the knitted sector may disobey the leader and refuse a capricious turn that could come at any moment.



Because our home country does not have a party mechanism capable of influencing the party's leadership or having a dialogue with it. There is also no body of the Sages of Torah scholars who is not democratic, but at least consists of a number of participants. There are no camps in the faction that will continue at the defining moment one way or the other. The chairman of the party is the ultimate authority. He will determine and he will vote, and the Israeli House voter may find the party in the next Knesset a Labor-Meretz coalition, a coalition with the ultra-Orthodox factions and, pardon it. He has no way of knowing. He is voting for a black hole party.