Despite the restrictions imposed on Americans by the Corona crisis, the level of support for President Neska and why has Sanders not been retiring? • Interpretation

• Standing on the shoulders of giants. Trump // Photo: AFP

Unexpectedly, the outbreak of the Corona crisis has become the pivotal event in the history of Donald Trump's presidency, to overshadow his entire list of achievements and failures so far in the domestic and international space, thus ruling his political destiny on November 3, 2020, to grace or triumph. Equally paradoxically, in the fact that the fiscal system and the capital market are running at a frenzied length, driven by dramatic upheavals, the president has also undergone far-reaching change in his conduct and the nature of his reactions to the blow, which has only damaged the foundations of society and the American economy.

While the first phase of the crisis had not yet absorbed its apocalyptic significance, the White House tended to dwell on the spread of the virus and defined it as a light and fleeting cloud, the president soon understood the gravity of the situation and made a U-turn. Not only did he adopt a state-of-the-art code of conduct, in an effort to share and regularly update his Democratic rivals, but he completely abandoned the classic Republican ideology, based on minimal state intervention in the economy, and - to a considerable extent - became President Democrat's path We've dealt with Roosevelt.



Indeed, in stark contrast to Republican President Herbert Hoover's catastrophic strategy of "Do's and Don'ts", which faces America's collapse of America's social and economic existence into the abyss, despair and despair over the last three years of the Great Depression, Trump continued his legacy Roosevelt and took far-reaching government initiatives that, until about a month ago, appeared to be light years away from his basic worldview. The declaration of a national emergency enabled the White House to streamline budgets and fundraising even before Congress approved the massive package of dimensions that it initiated to rescue the economy; Expanding the medical insurance eligibility framework for the disadvantaged; Tightening the supervision of the nursing system, especially in nursing homes; Budget armor to allow free corona virus diagnostic testing for an uninsured population; As well as suing the General Motors corporation to start manufacturing the respirators at an accelerated rate of 10,000 units per month without delay.



All of these are just some of the moves that the President has been firmly leading over the past two weeks, bringing him in the tunnel of time straight into the era of Roosevelt's social and financial revolution during the Great Depression. Not only that, but during this time, the White House avoided political controversy, demonstrated maximum public and media access, and most importantly - projected confident, determined, sober and realistic leadership (highlighting the severity of the crisis) in addressing the unexpected challenge.

Indeed, the public response to this discovery of presidential power was immediate, despite the price that US citizens had to pay for the severe restrictions imposed by the president on freedom of movement in the public domain. Indeed, the level of support for the president has soared to 48 percent - a record high more than two years.

On the other side of the barricade, and despite the atmosphere of national unity and social solidarity that formed in the face of the covert tsunami, Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders continues to barricade himself in his shell and refuses to acknowledge the inevitable. Although his chances of winning the Democratic nomination have long been zero, he continues - in his dogmatic and jealous way - to produce background noise in his intention to continue the race, and to add to his list of defeats, too, the state of Wisconsin, where the early elections are scheduled for Tuesday. Not only does his social and economic doctrine, based on the flow of huge federal budgets into the economy, appear to be a customer of the theater of absurdity, but there is a tangible danger that even if a few percent go to the polls, it will cause another wave of illnesses. None of this raises or lowers a Vermont senator whose supremacy is as transcendent as distributive justice, but not necessarily to his own flesh and blood party, who will be wasting their lives next week for a lost campaign.