The late Renee Schneider's friends who were killed in the Dolev attack wrote an open letter to the court after deciding to demolish only part of the terrorist • "Nothing can bring her back to us"
Following the High Court's decision to demolish only the upper floor of the terrorist who carried out the attack on Dolev, Rene Schenarb's classmates killed in the attack write an open letter to the court: "There was no reason to feel sorry for the terrorist's home while he brutally murdered Renee."
Photo: Shmuel Buchris
The High Court last Monday discussed the family petition of the terrorist Qassem Abdelarim Rajah Shevli, who was involved in the murder of the late Rene Schnav in a terror attack near the Dolev spring last August. The family asked not to demolish the lower floor of the house where the terrorist lived without the upstairs.
The IDF also wanted to seal and boycott the lower floor of the house, but judges Uzi Fogelman, Anat Baron and Yael Wilner stated that this floor should not be damaged, as the terrorist actually lived only on the upper floor, and the terrorist's family claimed that his aunt uses this floor as a storage room.
The severe attack happened last August: Terrorists detonated an explosive device in Ein Dani (Ein Bobin) near the Dolev settlement. The explosion of the luggage was hit by members of the Shenarb family who were traveling on the scene: Father Eitan and his son Dvir were seriously injured, the late Rene Schenarb was murdered from the explosion when she was only 17 years old.
In a letter written by Rana Schenarb's caste girls and clan, they wrote: "Our friend Rene Schenarb went out on Friday morning to walk with her father Rabbi Eitan and her brother in Ein Dani and was murdered on the way there. Rene was a special girl and an amazing friend. Her murder. She's missing us in so many ways and so many frames. "
"The High Court received a petition filed by the family of the third terrorist from the squad that murdered Renee, and decided to reduce the sentence he intended. In the petition, the terrorist's family claimed that if the High Court decides to demolish the home, it will violate one of their human rights. We ask, not from a political place , Not from a place of defiance, but from a place of deep pain and a desire to understand: why the terrorist violated Renee's most basic human right - for life, and never expressed regret, why did this right not be abolished? ".
"The terrorists' attorneys have argued that there are things that are important to the family at home and that have emotional value, such as walls, pictures, and household items. Walls can be rebuilt, photos can be taken again, but you can never give back to Renee. Her, feelings since the murder no one can erase, and the space she left behind no one can fill. "
"There was no reason to feel sorry for the terrorist's house while he brutally murdered Renee. While he decided for her and ended her life, a second before she pressed the button he should have known that the consequences would be severe, and maybe, just maybe Renee would still be walking around with us. And we smile that smiles. It's clear to us that the complete demolition of the house would never compare to Rene's life, but we think that is the minimum punishment one can expect from our state. The state should act with sensitivity to Renee, to us, to her citizens and to take care of their safety. killer".
"We want, begging for justice to be done. Not for us, but for Renee. We just want justice to be done."
