He is said to have raped a 16-year-old in Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn and has already been convicted of this. But because of a procedural error, the trial against an Afghan has to be reopened.
Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn - The Munich I Regional Court has to start a rape trial for the second time. These are two asylum seekers who, in September 2017, made a 16-year-old compliant in Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn and then allegedly raped them several times away from their accommodation. The older (30) had appealed. For an insane reason: the interpreter had not taken an oath in the first trial, contrary to what he said he had done.
Drugs and Alcohol - Then Rape
Of course, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) could not avoid this formal error, the revision had nothing to do with the deed itself. Another criminal chamber dealt with the sensational case on Friday. According to the indictment, the then 16-year-old had drunk alcohol and used drugs with a group of asylum seekers in their accommodation. Around 8 p.m., the young people dispersed; the 30-year-old defendant is said to have maneuvered the woman outside with his spec.
When she noticed the predicament she was in and struggled, she was beaten and choked, and held on to her arms and legs. The men undressed her abdomen and successively had sexual intercourse on her until a passer-by noticed and yelled at her. The men then fled but were later arrested.
The accomplice incriminates the accused - he denies everything
The 30-year-old was sentenced to six years 'imprisonment, the younger one to three years and nine months' imprisonment. He accepted the verdict, but the older one didn't. In the new edition of the trial, he vehemently denied having raped the 16-year-old. His specter had put a heavy load on him. But the 30-year-old didn't want to know about it. "I only saw him carry her out," he said. "But your shoes were at the scene," said the judge. "We were in the room," the accused said. And he also denied his testimony to the investigating judge. At that time he had remarked: "The whole police force must have been asleep when we finished it." He did not say that, the man claimed on Friday. The process continues.