Thus, according to a document from a lawyer dealing with the Harpaz case revealed in News 13 • Ministry of Justice: "Immaculate in his actions"

• Avichai Mandelblit during his time as a commander

  Photo: 

  IDF spokesperson

Journalist and presenter Ayala Hasson published Thursday (Thursday) 13 a document, which Attorney General Tony Goldberg wrote in the Harpaz case, explaining why the then Chief Military Advocate, Avichai Mandelblit, should be warned about a series of fraud, breach of trust and disruption. 

The document states, among other things, that "the commander's remarks are a distorted lie ... Suspicion explained that the commander method aided by Attorney General Raz Nazri and sent him to come to the document with his own powers, and perhaps even tried to sabotage an investigation and thwart the Its results. " 

The Harpaz affair - the end // Photo: Paz Bar

The prosecutor further details how not only to update then-Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi in the discussion rooms of the investigators and attorneys involved, but how he intended to influence the decision-makers, such as Deputy State Attorney Shuki Lamberger, to weigh in their favor: "The evidence A photo of an open channel guarded by the chief of staff, against current members of the police, is being reported regularly and detailed from the bottom of the investigation, from the meeting rooms, including the positions of the enforcement agencies involved. Above all - Music of the '5th Corps' inside the Attorney General's Office with an explicit agenda that seeks to tip the investigation in favor of those involved in the Chief of Staff Bureau. " 

The Attorney General further stated that the Attorney General even claimed that then-Deputy Commissioner Dudi Cohen also reported to the Chief of Staff and even claimed in his ear that they were "guarded".

The Justice Ministry spokesman said in response: "In light of the findings of Dr. Mandelblit's investigation, former Supreme Court Attorney Yehuda Weinstein, with the then State's Attorney Shay Nitzan, decided to shelve the investigation file. The judgment, which was issued in petitions against his appointment to the Judiciary, stated that he had not been immaculate in his actions and had not been guilty of any acts for which Mandelblit was being investigated. Trendy public opinion should be condemned which preceded the investigation and described a position and suspicions which, in the end, were refuted. "