High Court ruling on assembly of government and coalition agreement agitates political system • MK Zandberg: "Even if laws accused of bribery form a government, it does not become less stinky"
After the High Court unanimously decides that the issue of the Prime Minister's and most of the coalition agreement for the unity government between the Likud and the blue and white should not be interfered with - the reactions in the political system have not been late and the networks are booming.
Photo: GPO
Former Justice Minister MK Ayelet Shaked welcomed the decision and responded to the High Court ruling on her Twitter account. "The obvious should also be said: This is not a trial, it is politics. The arguments raised in this petition are arguments that make the political process a legal process, and it is good that the court refrained from intervening. The imposition of the mandate on the PM is the culmination of a definite political process that fulfills the people's choice. MK Shaked wrote.
He also has to say the obvious: It's not a trial, it's politics.
The arguments raised in this petition are arguments that make the political process a legal process, and it is good that the court refuses to intervene. The imposition of a mandate on the prime minister is the culmination of a definite political process that realizes the people's choice.
- Ayelet Shaked Ayelet Shaked (@Ayelet__Shaked) May 6, 2020
Among those welcoming the High Court ruling, the Minister of Culture and Sport, too, fired by Likud's Regev. "The judges of Jerusalem did not interfere. There is a sovereign in Israel - the people, and he said it, "the minister wrote on Twitter.
More on:
• The President lives in a High Court hearing: "When has the court intervened in a legislative process while it is happening?"
• Stop the constitutional train accident
• The rule of law against the rule of law
The Jerusalem judges did well not interfere. There is a sovereign in Israel - the people, and he said his thing.
- Miri Regev (@regev_miri) May 6, 2020
MK Tamar Zandberg of the Meretz Party was disappointed with the decision of the High Court of Justice and tweeted on Twitter that it "respects the decision of the High Court. Even if it is legal for a defendant in a bribe to form a government, it does not become less stinky. Tonight, too, who gives Netanyahu a hand - a partner in corruption. "
Respects the decision of the High Court. Even if it is legal for a defendant in a bribe to form a government, it does not become less stinky. Tonight, too, who gives Netanyahu a hand - a partner in corruption
- Tamar Zandberg (@tamarzandberg) May 6, 2020
Former Meretz Speaker Zahava Galon attacks the High Court decision: "The moral injustice of letting a person accused of infamy hold the state helm and serve as prime minister no court can bring justice, even if the decision was unanimously passed by 11 judges."
The moral injustice of letting a person accused of infamy hold the helm of the state and serve as prime minister no court can bring to justice, even if the decision was unanimously passed by 11 judges. pic.twitter.com/yCaTqPhE0Y
- Zehava Galon (@zehavagalon) May 6, 2020
The Twitter page of the Movement for Quality Government states: "Honorable High Court ruling. At the same time, morally and morally, it cannot be reconciled with the situation of a criminal prime minister. The Netanyahu-Gantz government is the essence of the term "kosher but smelly." In the evening we will have a huge demonstration in Rabin Square entitled "Israel is ashamed".
We respect the Supreme Court's decision. However, moral and ethical, we can not accept a situation of a criminal defendant prime minister. Netanyahu-Ganz is the essence of the term "kosher but stinking."
Saturday clean huge demonstration in Rabin Square under the banner " Israel is ashamed "
- Government Quality Movement (@MovGov) May 6, 2020