A request to receive material from the cellphone of the former attorney's office raises questions. • Why was he not held? • Why have we not examined material related to "sex for subscription"?
A legal proceeding regarding some of the materials available to the police reveals new details about the decision-making process in conducting the investigation in the Epi Nave case. In December, the prosecutor's office announced plans to indict him subject to the hearing, however, as of this date, "no date has been set for the hearing," as the prosecutor's office responded to our question.
About a week ago, Attorney Roni Aloni Sedovnik filed a motion to remove the prohibition of advertising placed on the materials confiscated from the devices of former Bar Association chairman Epi Naveh. According to her, these are specific materials concerning the procedure in which she is personally involved and that they are able to illuminate the case in a different light. She therefore sought permission to disclose the materials. Sadovnik represents the Army Radio reporter Hadas Taipei, lawsuits filed against Naveh following the publication of sex scandals for appointments. Sadovnik was appointed as part of the legal protection of journalistic myrtle Steif also filed lawsuits against Naveh following the publication of sex scandals for appointments.
Special this application is that it is not The request to allow the publication of the media of a particular material, or even a request or demand from the judicial system to investigate a new matter, is a legal process that is already under way, in which a party claiming to be injured asks for the right to present evidence that may prove his claims.
As part of the proceeding, the parties submitted responses to the request. Advocate Naveh, through his attorneys, argued that all cellular materials are protected due to the violation of his privacy, "there can be no justification for publishing private conversations obtained while committing serious offenses."
One of the claims raises interesting questions about how to handle materials received from cellular devices. According to Naveh, "As is well known, respondent 2 (Naveh) mobile phones were mapped and scoured by the Israel Police, the State Attorney's Office and the court. Criminal investigations were opened, with only one suspicion being filed. We learn that after a careful review of the information brought to the Investigating Authority, no information was found that could establish suspicion of criminal conduct. " The fact that other investigations have not been opened indicates that the rest of the material in the devices is "clean".
More on:
Effie Nave appeals against the immunity to Hadas Steif
Assessment: Police are investigating the material leak
Court Administration: Do not oppose the publication of the Neve affair
In contrast, Blade 433's response to the request tells a different story. "As part of the investigation, the investigator only requested (and received) computerized infiltration orders that allowed her to perform measured and limited searches on certain subjects only in the cellular phone copies that formed the basis of the investigation," the letter said. According to Blahav, although "in the case of" the case, the only investigating unit holds all cell phones that were seized during the investigation, "only the general materials in the search and penetration orders given in the case investigation can be considered as 'held' by the investigating unit. Because the requested materials were not included in the subjects for which the search and penetration orders were issued, they cannot be considered as 'held' by the investigating unit. "
In other words, the police have physical copies of all Nave's computer and cellular materials, but because it was limited by a court order to only one central case - sex for appointments - it did not examine these materials. According to Blade 433's response, and contrary to Naveh's claims, the other materials were not examined by the police, so it cannot be argued that the criminal potential that some claim to have is overwhelmingly denied.
The person who examined the complex and gave the order that accompanied the investigation is Judge Avichai Doron of the Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court. This fact has been criticized, because according to media outlets, correspondence exists with many senior officials in the legal system, including incumbent judges.
Recall, the only provision studied - sex for appointments - revealed on Army Radio. Now required materials for the benefit of another existing legal proceedings, the question arises whether the materials were legitimate investigation of one affair Why can not permit the use of other issues?
Attorney Boaz Ben Tzur , On behalf of Effie Naveh, said: "Hadas Stief broke Mr. Naveh's personal, password-protected mobile phones. Instead of exhausting his case with Stiff, she was granted immunity, which was conditional on Stiff's pledge to destroy the materials she produced from her breached phones." D. Sedovnick We learn that not only did Stipe, who rummaged through her phones, kept the information she produced from her, but that she Mosh, and has now made personal conversations between Mr. Naveh and the journalist to her lawyer, Adv. Sedovnick. Without referring to the content of the alleged material conversations at the request of Adv. Sedovnick - content that is denied - it is understandable that the phones were stolen, hacked, and their contents leaked. Revealing personal conversations. The investigating unit has also made it clear to the court that the application for dismissal was denied. It should also be emphasized that Mr. Nave has no connection to the disciplinary proceedings against Attorney Sedovnik in the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Bar. "
The Israeli police said: "Since the matter is under a prohibition order issued by the court, we cannot address the issue which is at the door of the court."