Social News
Written by: Zhang Jiamin
2020-05-16 23:50
Date of last update: 2020-05-16 23:52On Thursday (14th), the examination paper for the history of the middle school diploma exam started on Thursday. One of the questions asked about the advantages and disadvantages of Japan to China from 1900 to 1945. The test questions caused a stir. The Education Bureau was kicked off as a course development director to serve as a member of the History Examination Committee. The Bureau said tonight that the staff was a front-line teacher before being hired by the Education Bureau. Status participation; after working in the education bureau, the person applied to continue the work, but the education bureau never asked about its external work, and its external work and its performance had nothing to do with the education bureau.
According to the Education Bureau, the specific implementation details of the examination mechanism are not understood nor understood by the Education Bureau; however, the Education Bureau should in principle participate in the examination committee of all subjects to strengthen the links between the curriculum and the assessment. The Education Bureau will nominate personnel who are familiar with the curriculum It is up to the HKEAA to decide whether to invite or appoint.
The Education Bureau refers to the staff who participated in the Examination Paper Examination Committee of the History Branch. They joined before joining the Education Bureau last year. (Photo by Zhang Haowei)
The Education Bureau refers to the fact that it is unaware of the membership list and specific operation of the History Examination Diploma Examination Committee this year, and the personnel of the Education Bureau disclosed by the media were front-line teachers before they were hired by the Education Bureau. participate. After working in the education bureau, the person applied to continue the outside work, and the education bureau only approved the employee's application for outside work. The personnel's external work and performance have nothing to do with the Education Bureau. The Education Bureau has never asked about the details of its external work, and based on the confidentiality principle of the Evaluation Bureau, the officer did not disclose the details of the work of the committee members of the examination committee to the Education Bureau. The Education Bureau alleges that the relevant report attempted to cause the Education Bureau to know the test questions before the start of the examination, referring to the media "making up the statement that the Education Bureau cut the seat."
The Education Bureau pointed out that in principle, it should participate in the examination committee of all subjects. The bureau hopes to nominate people who are familiar with the course to the evaluation bureau to consider and decide whether to invite the examination committee if human resources permit. Under the current mechanism, the Evaluation Bureau still has independent decision-making power on the composition and appointment of the committee members. Whether to invite and appoint is still up to the Evaluation Bureau.
Concerned about the leakage of confidential information by the HKEAA
The Education Bureau pointed out that the Bureau did not participate in the specific implementation details of the question review mechanism, including the number of posts established, the number of meetings, and who was invited to form the question review committee, and did not know the relevant details. Because the appointment is regulated by the confidentiality provisions of the Evaluation Bureau Regulations, the employees of the Education Bureau who have participated in the work of the Examination Committee cannot disclose the details of the work to the Education Bureau; in order to respect the confidentiality regulations of the Evaluation Bureau, the Education Bureau did not require employees to report their participation. The Education Bureau refers to the in-depth description of the question-examination mechanism when asked by the media, and is worried about whether there is any leakage of the confidential information of the Evaluation Bureau. Based on the seriousness of the incident, the HKEAA must also strictly follow up.
According to the "Apple Daily" report, the only question drafter for this year's HKDSE history paper is a course development director who joined the Education Bureau last year, and the person has taken up a new position in the Education Bureau before participating in the question review committee meeting for the first time.
DSE History Department | One article to see how thrilling two managers resigned in the three days before resignation
DSE History Section | On the Sino-Japanese Relations Provoked Controversy The Federation of Trade Unions Protested to the Examination Bureau to Promote the Cancellation of Test Questions
DSE History Section ｜ Deng Zhenqiang: You can only answer more deeds than benefit and study hard to understand economic aggression
DSE History Department | Candidates: Cancel the test questions Unfair Education Association Huang Junyu: Or to the diplomatic turmoil
DSE History Department ｜ Education Bureau early in the morning admitted that some officials participated in the test and did not know the test questions before debugging
DSE History Department | Candidates denounce DQ Sino-Japanese relations questions
DSE 2020DSE