The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The person who pretends to sleep is also the time to wake up

2020-05-22T22:38:01.288Z


[Note: At the end of writing this article, the National People's Congress just announced the review of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law."] The epidemic will soon pass, and it is unpredictable whether it will reappear. The riots of the anti-revision laws gradually became silent, but the recurrence of the riots was inevitable. epidemic


01 point of view

Written by: Yu Pinhai

2020-05-23 06:30

Last update date: 2020-05-23 06:30

[Note: At the end of writing this article, the National People's Congress just announced to review the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law"]

The epidemic will soon pass, and it is unpredictable whether it will recur. The riots of the anti-revision laws gradually became silent, but the recurrence of the riots was inevitable. The future of the epidemic is determined by science. As long as vaccines are prepared, drugs needed for treatment are prepared, and public health is managed, the epidemic will not be too serious even if it comes again. But the society did not pay attention to the root cause of the anti-amendment riots. Just like after the "Occupy Central", people thought that the rain would be fine, and as a result, a bucket of ice water was poured down, and even those who pretended to sleep were conscious. The anti-amendment riot was caused by amending the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance, but the situation was so fierce that it had nothing to do with amending the law; it seems that "Occupy Central" may be under the slogan for universal suffrage, but the situation has developed to such a chaotic state, but Just because of universal suffrage. The structure of society ’s vested interests cannot be changed, and fairness and justice cannot be guaranteed, which means that without vaccines and drugs, riots will of course recur, and politics cannot be stable.

Rab cannot change the rules and the scale of power

In order to share the "results" of the anti-amendment riots, the Citizen Party, chaired by the Honourable Guo Rongkeng, deliberately lobbed in the election of the chairman of the Legislative Council ’s House Committee in October last year. At that time, the social atmosphere and situation were unfavorable to the establishment of the system. Chairman Li Huiqiong adopted the appeasement policy, avoiding the weight and ignoring the importance. As a result, the work of the internal council was delayed for more than half a year, the Legislative Council was almost suspended, and many legislative delays, including the National Anthem Act. The central government began to change its strategy for governing Hong Kong at the beginning of the year. The "Xia Luo New Bureau" has a neat and tough attitude, and the situation has been rapidly reversed recently. Within two weeks, Li Huiqiong regained control of the internal conference, and Liang Junyan cut the cloth hard to complete the election of the president of the internal conference. Guo Rongkeng seemed to be in a menacing situation, leading the overall situation, but as soon as the opponent shot, he was defeated in an instant.

It used to be that Sven ’s Citizen Party and Democratic Party became the brave factions in the Parliament. It is difficult for the public to imagine that the former Citizen MP Yu Ruowei or Liang Jiajie, the Democratic Party ’s Emily Liu and Yang Sen, would stage such a big dragon and phoenix in the Parliament. Some people explained that this was a pan-parliamentary parliamentarian who was hijacked by the brave faction. The unofficial district councillors who won the election of the district council at the end of last year requested the pan-legislative councillors to stay in the election of the chairman of the internal council. betray. It seems that the populist forces are indeed powerful. Even high-weight Legislative Councillors must listen to the lack of power of district councillors, and the Pan Democratic Party must also submit to a group of scattered soldiers.

The Legislative Council held a meeting on May 8 during which Pan-Democratic and Institutional Assembly members disputed the power of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong to chair the meeting. Li Huiqiong then expelled several Pan-Democratic Members from the conference room and continued to hold meetings with the Institutional Deputies . (Photo by Luo Junhao)

However, no matter how loud the political slogans and political opinions are, it is impossible to get rid of the scale of real rules and power. In response to a reporter's question, the Central Liaison Office reversed the game's results. If so, why did the farce take so long? The reason is very simple. Most people are reluctant to take responsibility for the political civilization of this city. The President of the Legislative Council is like this. The chairman of the DAB is also unaware of the advancement and retreat, not to mention the public opinion representatives of the Citizen Party and the Democratic Party. These politicians verbally insist on one country, two systems, and a high degree of autonomy. However, it was only after the Chinese Communist Party organized the filming stage that they learned about chaos. The "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" was also introduced against this background. Who is undermining a high degree of autonomy, who is inviting the central government to "intervene", is it a Rabbi, or is it the right to use the system? In September, the Legislative Council elections will be held. Pan-popular and institutional members are unwilling to offend their own voters and lack principles in doing things. The Liaison Office must also be concerned about the election situation, but it is estimated that it believes that political rules are more worthy of maintenance than a temporary victory or defeat.

The election is to choose representatives of public opinion. The election of the Legislative Council must select members who make laws for Hong Kong. The power cannot be overstated. Last year ’s elections for pan-democratic and amateur candidates in the District Councils were so successful that they were ambitious for the elections of the Legislative Council in September this year and believed that they had the opportunity to win more than half of the seats and control the overall situation. The epidemic has brought this kind of imagination back to reality. Everyone encounters the coldness after passion. If they can't maintain the temperature, they will give up their efforts. In view of this, the members of the Pan-Legislative Legislative Assembly have obstructed the elections in the internal conferences and become logical. The original genre turned into a clamoring machine, those who once cherished feathers also moved forward bravely, the law-abiding turned into trying the law, and even systematically interfered with the operation of the Parliament. The purpose is to express their views to the populist forces and prove that they will also sacrifice for "justice". However, everyone knows that justice is not so thin and light, and it cannot be obtained by rough means. The government cannot do it, nor can the general public.

Pseudo-propositions cover the real issues under populist politics

Two days ago, President Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan was sworn in for his second term. Tsai Ing-wen more than a year ago was a box office poison in Taiwan ’s elections. Even the comrades in the party were worried about losing power. Her executive dean Lai Qingde challenged her. Fortunately, her election operation was still quite good, and she kept the party ’s primary election. High votes win big positions. Why has Taiwan not changed at all but public opinion has so changed? Through the operation of politics and public opinion, people's sentiments can change a lot. The public opinion that looks like a play but is a political reality in more than two years has witnessed ups and downs and is a spectacle. Is this the proper law for elections? Perhaps it should be asked in turn, what should be the case if the election is not the case?

Presidential elections are held in the United States at the end of the year. The election battle has already begun, and China has become one of the key issues. Trump's popularity in the race for re-election has been ups and downs due to the epidemic. Whether the epidemic has helped him or hurt him has not been clearly pointed out. However, no one would doubt that Sino-US relations will be more or less fierce. If the political fluctuations in Hong Kong and Taiwan are already linked to Sino-US relations, the US elections and related political operations will naturally resonate Hong Kong and Taiwan. What exactly connects them all? Of course it is election. Elections take place all year round, why are they particularly effective these days? Quite simply, election politics in recent years has gradually moved towards populism, which is characterized by utility spillovers. When social conflicts increase sharply and the source is uneven distribution of economic benefits, populist politics naturally stands out.

In mid-October last year, a Hong Kong people ’s rally asked the United States to pass the Hong Kong Bill of Rights as soon as possible (Getty Images)

The commonality of elections is the operation of issues, which can be true or false, or completely false. Taking Hong Kong as an example, many people set the central government's "hope" for Hong Kong to become "one country, one system" as an important issue. In fact, it is totally groundless because it is completely inconsistent with political logic. If the central government wants Hong Kong to implement "one country, one system", there is no need to spend a lot of money, just one order. The Sino-British Joint Declaration is not binding on China. It is not even an agreement, not to mention the real agreement can be canceled at will. As long as the United States sends a notice to Russia, the medium-range missile agreement will be cancelled. Has n’t Iran ’s six-party nuclear agreement changed in the same way as the US president; even the Paris climate agreement is the same as Trump ’s withdrawal from the United States. The two countries issued a "declaration" on the return of Hong Kong. The policy of Hong Kong to maintain one country, two systems and a high degree of autonomy is due to China's adherence to and strict adherence to the Basic Law. The British and American governments know this well, but they never say anything about it. Some politicians manipulate a pseudo-proposition out of purely political need. It is easy to confuse the public, but in many cases it works.

Guo Rongkeng's operation in the Legislative Council was a fake issue. why? If Liang Junyan and Li Huiqiong made arrangements for cutting cloth one month after the Rab incident, wouldn't the farce already end? They may lack political courage, so they did not do so, but made Pan Pan MPs and supporters think they had a winning blow. In fact, this is just an illusion, as long as the opponent makes a shot, he will lose immediately. A political operation that is purely hype and has no power behind it is of course a fake issue. But even if it is false, if you do not handle it well, you can still toss for more than half a year. Stakeholders who are waiting to watch their changes are of course mixed, but the answer is already there.

What is the real issue in political wrestling? The clever use of the power relations within the Legislative Council has allowed Li Huiqiong to regain the power of the chairman and correct the previous chaos; the Central Liaison Office is not under the jurisdiction of Article 22 of the Basic Law, and can directly represent the status of the Central Committee on Hong Kong affairs. The Constitution and the Law Confirm that public opinion will calm down a few days later; young brave demonstrators began to plead guilty to riots in court, sentenced to years in prison, "brother-and-foot" can only secretly sigh; the United States has promised that in the end, it did not move at the World Health Assembly Discussing Taiwan ’s identity, Taiwan is not invited to participate, and once again confirms that China ’s influence on the United States is much greater than that of Taiwan; China imposes tariffs on Australian barley and other commodities. Australia does not even dare to fight back. You can imagine the strength calculation behind it; The death toll from the new US pneumonia epidemic has reached 100,000, and the unemployment rate has soared to nearly 20%, which has threatened Trump's reelection. These are all real issues that cannot be blurred, nor can they be confused. It is a reflection of the strength behind them and directly impacts personal safety, political status and economic interests.

Say no to the election operation

It is the normal state in elections that the real issues are obscured by false issues and false propositions. This is the essence of election operations. Political conflicts usually arise because of false propositions and false issues, and are finally resolved because of the emergence of real issues. However, during the conflict, many people's interests will be wasted, and they have been scarred when they woke up. Even if society finally turns the fog away, and the real issues gradually emerge, those who want to pretend to sleep can still continue to pretend. Some scholars and critics are still providing "theoretical" support for the "Yellow Economic Circle". A few people are still organizing demonstrations and continue to declare Hong Kong independence, but there are few participants; the Taiwan government continues to deceive the people. Western countries will stand with themselves to resist China, but in fact none of these countries are willing to do a real thing for Taiwan; the US President continues to attack China, but the recent strategic report still emphasizes the importance of maintaining cooperation with China. The aftermath of the anti-amendment riots that occurred last year is still there, and some people continue to put forward the "five major demands, all indispensable", but is it possible? These are all fake issues promoted by politicians and opinion makers, just like Hong Kong independence, which has been a false proposition since the beginning.

Hong Kong is a society ruled by law, and abiding by the law is regarded as a core value. Upholding justice depends on the implementation of the rule of law, but in reality the law is formulated by those in power, and it is inseparable from the operation of politics and power, and even escorts power. This is the true political ethics of modern society, and it is the same for both the United States and Britain. The pursuit of justice is a matter of course, but misunderstanding the relationship between power, law and justice will only bring unrealistic imagination. Why do some people always think that they represent justice, and imagine that the law will serve the justice they define? It may be that politicians and speculative scholars have put forward some fallacies and unrealistic imaginations, confusing everyone, or the people may be willing to be deceived.

The promulgation of the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" by the National People's Congress predominantly shows that we have no great faith in Hong Kong's own legislation on Article 23 of the Basic Law. (China News Agency)

What is worrying is that such misunderstandings and myths are not uncommon, and gradually become a common phenomenon in society. We saw that the brave warriors who promoted force did nothing, tossing for more than nine months, in vain, harming others and harming themselves, and some young people even ruined their lives; those who advocated Hong Kong independence were only talking about it. If they knew that it was going to be implemented, the car would be destroyed. Not many people will try. Participate in political games without knowing how much money you have. If you do n’t know how to spend it, you will be confused. What you want to fight for is confounded. You may be able to deceive yourself for a while. You want to win but you must wear a helmet. It will be gray.

Whenever the election is approaching, the political arena will be dancing and dancing, seeing the happy heart, thinking it is a good opportunity for fame and fortune. But for those who only know how to seek private gains, provoke alienation, do not do specific work, and talk in vain, why does society give them the opportunity to fish in troubled waters?

Just after publishing this article, the central government announced that it would formulate a national security law for Hong Kong. Once again, power is the backing of politics, and the political slogan is vulnerable to law and system. If you choose to continue to sleep, you will not see the real issue.

【New Coronary Pneumonia】 The significance of the epidemic to Hong Kong politics

Hong Kong still wants to change with the same?

Hong Kong needs "Lion Mountain Spirit 2.0"

The arrogance and prejudice band does not free democracy

01 Viewpoint Basic Law 23 Articles in Pinhai Port National Security Law

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-05-22

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.