PM Netanyahu immersed in Nuclear, Cyber ​​and Intelligence, while Chief of Staff Tzubar Kochad in terrorist and Syrian armies

• Division 7 carriage tank in the Golan Heights exercise, in February this year

  Photo: 

  Eyal Margolin / Ginny

Major General Aviv Kochavi is the fourth chief of staff to deal with cuts - not necessarily in accordance with a budget cut, but rather in the order of the IDF forces. The truncation of forces according to "Tnuva", again bounces again and again with full force (Gen.) Isaac Brick. 

At the heart of the cut by senior commanders in the reserve is the wiping of about 200 IDF tanks. The decision has already been made. "This is a brigade and a few regiments," Brick said this week, furious at the abandonment of the IDF's land forces. "It comes after Gideon, our friend, former chief of staff, Gadi Iznakot has already taken down hundreds of tanks. This brings the IDF to a state of inability to defend."

A conversation with another former senior brings up the following picture: The more conventional a land-based army is perceived as dwarfed, and perhaps the weaker the enemy, the more it develops offensive plans and prepares offensive commandos. See Hizbullah: Former Israeli military discourse in fighting against the organization Today, the discourse is retreating more and more to the defense - fighting in Lebanon for fighting in Israeli territory, when a situation may arise where Hizbullah forces run to the fence, crossing and penetrating the Galilee communities - the IDF will find it difficult to provide reasonable defense force To stop the move.

"In tests done in the appropriate frames in the IDF, the size of the baruch turned out," says Yitzhak Brick. The IDF simply will not have enough forces after the cut, according to the SC, for three scenarios plus one more arena. Ashkenazi chief of staff, he built the IDF for fighting in two arenas of terrorist organizations, Hamas in the south and Hezbollah in the north; Even after the ground power cuts, the IDF was about twice what it is today. 

The third arena ignored by the public and the security forces is Judea and Samaria. Thousands of "Tanzim" men leave for delegates or localities, or lurk in the IDF in the Arab communities, with weapons in hand. We haven't experienced it yet, so we don't know what that means. "Even in the 2002 defensive wall operation, the IDF fought in Judea and Samaria Recruits almost all of the regular units, and with the addition of reserve divisions, ”Brick recalls.

"The IDF, with all these irresponsible cuts, will find it difficult to defend. And I'm not talking about the ability to take out an attack, "he says." And there's also the Syrian army. Do you think that 'momentum' does not address the Syrian threat ?! The IDF says it prepares power for two terrorist armies. And suppose the Syrians are still unfit. Within a year or two they will be facing you with some 2,000 state-of-the-art tanks, plus a large number of less-advanced tanks. Are the IDF ready for ten years? Can you build a plan without addressing such a threat? "

At the time, when Chief of Staff Gantz introduced a plan to further cut hundreds of tanks, he also announced that the IDF could not attack simultaneously on two fronts. Defense on one front and attack in only one arena. This lengthens the duration of the campaign. Many opposed the chief of staff for the cut, but the plan was approved. "There is a discontinuity in the military's policy, and they are approaching a diminution," says Brick. "The existing IDF is being shunned, but the new IDF is still on the horizon."

The proof of lack of thinking comes with the shock of the Iranian missile and hovercraft attack on Saudi Arabia's oil facilities. For the past 10 years, the Middle East has been in the routine of strategic surprises almost once a week, but the IDF has stuck to the fixation of two terrorist armies and cut the skeleton. What does not contribute to the return of the IDF to this path is that Prime Minister Netanyahu and Chief of Staff Kochavi do not see eye In the eye, the combination between the answer to the threat of the far circle at the center of the Iran nuclear deal and the threat of the near circle of the known enemies. 

Netanyahu is focused on nuclear, cyber, intelligence, air force. Kochavi thinks the balance is imminent and the imminent threat - that is, the terrorist armies and Syria - is at risk for its nuclear threat. There is an argument over whether headquarters work will be needed to redefine security theory within a timely manner, which will require the IDF to build itself up against the threats. 

yellow Submarine

Why is Eliad Shraga pushing the submarine case headlines, and is it related to the court's gray work routine

The submarine affair. Why did she re-watch the stale waters of Israeli politics? Does anyone smell an election system on the horizon? It is more likely to come up again because the investigations files against Netanyahu have sunk into the routine courtesy of some district court and have lost their intrusion power. In the world of brainwashing and Pavlovian conditioning, there is nothing like the submarines.

Their role now resembles that of October 2016, when public space broke out, and a few months later became an investigation file with multiple zeros. So like today, Benjamin Netanyahu does not carry a neon "criminal" neon on his forehead. They have not been able to decide on any cases of what crime they are facing. A thief is a thief, a rapist is a rapist, a killer is a killer and a traitor is a traitor. And there are other distinct types of delinquency. This is why he continues to serve as prime minister; Because the fact that the prime minister does not think that the prime minister will be a criminal.

In October 2016, Boogie Ya'alon blasted the "submarine affair" through the anti-Netanyahu writings. It can be guessed that the goal was to torpedo the strategic security submarine deal. But the investigations did not take height. Each affair burst into terrible noise to stun the public, to shock them, through the conditioning of communication as a brainwashing tool: secret talks with publisher Noni Moses. 

In order to give momentum to the investigations, a major suspicion on a central security issue had to be raised. Netanyahu was previously introduced as a lunatic when he directed the IDF to prepare for the attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities.

After the investigations stabilized, at the end of the submarine affair, it fell - at least for Netanyahu. But that was not the goal - dropping some waffles that wanted to make a coupe on the submarine purchase. The goal was to drown Netanyahu along with the submarines and fulfill the wishes of President Obama's democratic administration and security establishment. 

When the affair was still fresh and the various actors had not yet invented permanent narratives in the interrogations, I heard first-hand about the submarine issue that developed immediately upon Netanyahu's entry into the Prime Minister's Office. , Merkel's consultant, Christophe Hoisgen, raised the issue - as a condition for the sixth submarine - of supplying the equipment to Egypt, claiming it was hidden by Netanyahu. 

Since Netanyahu did not have these initial contacts, I do not believe that the story of the submarine supply to Egypt was unknown to anyone. What is clear: Since Netanyahu went against the wishes of IDF leaders, he probably had reason to fear that someone in the system would torpedo the essential procurement. Recall: Acquiring the four submarines is necessary to strengthen deterrence in the emerging era of nuclear Middle East. Time between order and delivery. Until they arrive, a few submarines will be dropped off.

The resumption of the case raises the hypothesis that Eliad Shraga and his friends feel that Netanyahu's trial may not yield the mikveh, and that the campaign against Mandelblit needs an answer. The problem is that he is tired of having Shraga run the state through the High Court. Is he the driver of the D-9?

Back in the 90's

Elyakim Hatzani claims he has been debating Trump's outline with Netanyahu for three decades 

Elyakim Eretz is similar to Isaac Brick. As a phenomenon. It is amazing that even today, brainwashing and mob culture and crowds screaming according to operating words, a lonely person and personality can come to shake the tree. 

"Netanyahu wants something that is not a state but will be called a state." Elyakim HaTzani // Photo: Coco

Major General Brick passed most of his life until three years ago, when he was already 70, as an anonymous hero. Only a few knew about him and his actions. Elyakim the Elyakim was better known, and despite being beaten as one of the founding fathers of the new settlement in Judea and Samaria, he remained at least in his image as a separate personality. He was not swallowed up by the so-called "settler leaders" or "Gush Emunim leaders." 

Now that a wave of opposition to the Netanyahu sovereignty program is rising within the Trump program, Elyakim has appeared with several articles that explain why not. One can say with certainty that without the nervousness of the jerk against the plan, the campaign now underway would not rise more than an inch above the ground. 

"I wish I changed reality," he told me this week in a phone call from his home in Kiryat Arba. You did not change, but the influence, I encouraged myself, because maybe he had already changed reality. "Writers do not know the fate of the letters. Sometimes they hit the target. I wrote that I must write. You know it yourself. Writing because you have to."

Nazzi clarified that the dispute with Prime Minister Netanyahu about the political plan is not from today. It is long-standing. He recalls a conference of the journal "Path" more than 20 years ago, although we could not accurately place the event on the timeline. The Oslo agreement or after; whether before or after Netanyahu's first term as prime minister, then in the 1990s. "It was in the press house, the Sokolov House in Tel Aviv," he recalls. "And there Netanyahu spoke and spoke convincingly, as he knows. I asked him exactly about the Palestinian state. How did it occur to me then? Do not know. And he answered me with the Trump plan! The controversy on the subject has not changed. His answer did not satisfy me, and did not change in millimeters. It is obvious that he does not want a Palestinian state. 

"Netanyahu wants something that is not a state but will be called a state. It's not his whim. When he talked about it, who ever dreamed about Trump! I share his constraints. I also don't want to annex or give citizenship to the residents; so the constraints are clear."

Although the lazy (94-year-old in a few days) is certain that when a Palestinian state is established - and he will remain in Kiryat Arba - he will be forced to travel to Jerusalem via Be'er Sheva, but the really important reason is the entity to be called "a state." "In the end - how our ancestors said, weeds will grow in your cheeks, Netanyahu, and a country is still a state. That means that like Germany or Afghanistan, the land there is Palestinian as the land in Germany is German and although Germany is destroyed, a German state remains."

The price of protection

Obama wanted to end his term with a Palestinian state on the '48 lines, nor does it convince opponents of sovereignty

Ariel Kahane's exposure this week to President Obama's planning at the end of his term - is a bomb. Kahana revealed, according to Prime Minister Netanyahu's statement that in addition to resolving the settlement illegality beyond the 1967 lines, Obama planned to impose a Palestinian state within the 48 'borders through a Security Council resolution. What halted the move was Putin's promise to impose Putin! Obama wanted until the end of his term as president to establish a Palestinian state.

Elyakim the self and his friends see that time after time there were anti-Israeli breakthroughs - such as the Oslo Accords, the Chinese evacuation, the evacuation of the Gaza Strip and northern Samaria. The story of Obama shows that passive sitting in defense inevitably leads to political entrepreneurs who want to impose the Clinton outline, or worse. Applying sovereignty is a preventative political move. Historians insist: a Palestinian state did not rise in '37 or '47, nor after the Oslo Accords. It's a gamble, opponents say. "All life is a gamble."