The Hong Kong version of the National Security Law 〡 Support Legislation Forum Tan Yaozong changed the sentence: the starting point for sentencing is 5 years and 10 years at the most

Political situation

Written by Peng Zhuowei

2020-06-23 20:53

The details of the draft "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" have been revealed a few days ago (20th) and have attracted widespread attention from the community and the political community. Tonight (23rd), the Hong Kong community from the formation camp supported the National Security Legislative United Front to hold an online forum, inviting Liang Zhenying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, Tan Yaozong, member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, Wu Qiubei, a representative of the Hong Kong District People's Congress, and Tan Huizhu, deputy director of the Basic Law Committee. Responding to questions from netizens on the spot, it is expected that there may be some lip service. "Hong Kong 01" will broadcast the forum.

21:42 Earlier, Tan Yaozong revealed that the criminal liability for violation of the National Security Law of the Minato City will be imprisonment for 3 to 10 years. Today, the forum changed the accusation to say that the maximum criminal liability is 10 years and the starting point for sentencing is 5 years. The guests present said that they should be spicy, and Tan Yaozong said that he would report to the Central Committee.

Regarding the retrospective period of the National Security Law, Liang Zhenying reminded that even before the implementation of the National Security Law, the existing law can still prosecute related acts. Ge Peifan also urged young people not to believe the pan-citizens in the wrong way. More exciting". Liang Meifen said that even if the crimes committed before would still be evidence, the unnamed criticism of Dai Yaoting's propaganda for breaking the law and justice means "to push young people off the cliff."

Tan Huizhu said that she signed a confidentiality agreement, so she spoke less. She hoped that the legislation would make Hong Kong people understand that one country, two systems is the best for Hong Kong, and emphasized that the criminals behind the crimes of young people must be brought to justice.

Wu Qiubei said that the current window period before legislation emphasizes the need to complete the legislation as soon as possible, so that young people can understand the importance of national security.

Regarding the appointment of the Chief Executive’s appointed judges to be accused of interfering in judicial independence, the DAB explained that all judges are appointed by the Chief Executive, and now they are only looking for a group of more familiar responsibilities, criticizing the demonization and discrediting of the relevant claims. Tan Huizhu pointed out that there are special judges in the Family Court, which is common in the world, and now only a panel of judges is responsible. Liang Zhenying criticized the Bar Association’s statement that it was extremely unprofessional and regarded the other party as a non-professional group.

21:37 The forum entered an interactive session. Li Zijing took the lead in throwing questions, saying that the trial and the closure of the Fa will be held in Hong Kong. Liang Zhenying pointed out that any international security issues in the world are determined by the central government. At first, the central government only trusted Hong Kong and gave it to them. Hong Kong is partly responsible, but special circumstances require the country to come forward, and the national security issue is indeed very serious. Hong Kong may not have enough experience to deal with it. He again approved the Central Government to come forward for national security legislation, which was forced out by the speculators, hoping not to force it out a second time.

Liang Meifen said that the central authorities have been careful about the legislation to protect the safety of the people throughout the country, describing the rescue of Hong Kong. For the national security issues that Hong Kong cannot be responsible for, such as strong independence, Tibetan independence, etc., the country will take action in these very few situations. It is Hong Kong’s own responsibility. If you don’t want to have a second round of speculation, you shouldn’t do anything.

As for whether the National Security Law will have a retrospective period? Liang Meifen said that common law has no retrospective effect under normal circumstances, but there may be exceptions, and he believes that many people must fall into the law after the legislation.

Earlier Tan Yaozong revealed that the criminal liability for violation of the National Security Law of the Minato City will be imprisonment for 3 to 10 years, and today the forum changed the accusation to say that the maximum criminal liability is 10 years and the starting point for sentencing is 5 years. The guests present said that they should be spicy, and Tan Yaozong said that he would report to the Central Committee.

21:22 The "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" draft note states that under certain circumstances, the central government exercises jurisdiction over a very small number of crimes that endanger national security. Tan Yaozong said that unless there are some very few examples, the SAR government cannot deal with it, and it will ask the central government for help before the central government will take action.

Tan Yaozong also said that someone had suggested to him that the offender should be returned to the Mainland for trial after the legislation, or that the Mainland judge should try the case in Hong Kong, but the recommendations were not implemented in the end.

21:22 The DAB Legislator Ge Gefan criticized that many people went abroad to sing in Hong Kong, thinking that foreign intervention was very obvious, including providing funds for the struggle, training some Hong Kong people to be mobsters, and even raising the American flag in the resistance movement. . She criticized that many Hong Kong people do not even have the freedom to travel, and said that they have received a lot of public feedback, hoping that the National Security Law will be enacted quickly.

21:17 Pakatan Harapan Member of the Legislative Council Liang Meifen pointed out that the legislation is to resolve the threat of violence in a peaceful manner. Liang Meifen said that the Mainland had enacted the National Security Law as early as 2015, and Hong Kong still did not cherish the opportunity to legislate its own 23 laws after taking the occupation. At that time, she had predicted that once the international situation became tense, the Central Government had to quote Article 18 of the Basic Law Article (3): Legislation on matters beyond the scope of the SAR’s autonomy, such as national defense and diplomacy. She believes that Hong Kong has not cherished the central government's high level of trust and love for Hong Kong. She also criticized that Pan Pan, who blocked 23 pieces of legislation, was very malicious, and created a better atmosphere for the establishment of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law.

21: 14 Tan Huizhu, deputy director of the Basic Law Committee, said that the Obama era in the United States indicated that he would return to California. When Planp came to power, Washington's rapid rise to the Chinese route, so she fully supported this legislation, "Let’s listen, It’s not going to succeed."

21:12 The representative of the National People’s Congress Wu Qiubei said that the United States has intervened in Hong Kong’s affairs and argued that Hong Kong is a bastion of freedom. Therefore, he opposed the national security legislation. The facts proved that the United States was naked intervention. He also criticized the United States for double standards because the United States There are many national security laws inside.

Wu Qiubei said that this time the legislation was passed by the National People’s Congress to show the will and interests of the people, criticizing the United States not for Hong Kong’s sake, disregarding Hong Kong’s interests, but as a chess piece and as a base to subvert China, so they must stand clearly Oppose US intervention in legislation.

21:10 The Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress Tan Yaozong mentioned that it has received support from many citizens on the Internet. After the legislation, it listed the crimes of foreign interference and local collusion. As for what refers to collusion, Tan Yaozong refers to everyone’s managers mentioning collusion between officials and businessmen. How can it be unclear how collusion is defined. He also mentioned that some district councillors intimidating the District Commissioner in the district council would impose sanctions on the United States. This is an example of collusion, and criticism is that these people write blacklists to the United States. However, Tan Yaozong pointed out that the public need not be afraid. After promulgating the law, it proves that there is something to be prosecuted, and restores social peace.

21:00 Liang Zhenying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, said that in the past year or two, he saw external forces inserting his hands into Hong Kong, and some small politicians in Hong Kong went abroad many times to demand sanctions against their own countries, emphasizing that no place in the world can tolerate these acts , So the country has to use legal means to stop it.

Liang Zhenying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, said that in the past year or two, he saw external forces inserting his hands into Hong Kong, and some small politicians in Hong Kong went to foreign countries many times to demand sanctions against their own countries. It must be stopped by legal means.

Hong Kong version of the National Security Act 〡 Tan Yaozong: Under special circumstances, if the Hong Kong government requires the central government to transfer the case to the Mainland

The Hong Kong version of the National Security Law 〡Central Officials' Forum in Hong Kong

Hong Kong version of National Security Law｜People’s Daily: Central officials go to Hong Kong to collect opinions and hold a number of seminars

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law｜Li Guoneng: Chief Executive appointed judges, the central government has jurisdiction to undermine judicial independence

Hong Kong version of National Security Law | Lin Zheng Yue'e: The legal basis is clear and unambiguous　

21:29 The forum entered an interactive session, and Li Zijing took the lead in throwing questions, saying that there was news that the trial and the closure of the Fa will take place in Hong Kong. Liang Zhenying pointed out that any national security issue in the world is determined by the central government. At first, the central government only trusted Hong Kong and handed over a part of it to let Hong Kong take responsibility. However, special circumstances require the country to come forward. The national security problem is indeed very serious. Hong Kong may not have enough experience to deal with it. He again approved the Central Government to come forward for national security legislation, which was forced out by the speculators, hoping not to force it out a second time.

Liang Meifen said that the central authorities have been careful about the legislation to protect the safety of the people throughout the country, describing the rescue of Hong Kong. For the national security issues that Hong Kong cannot be responsible for, such as strong independence, Tibetan independence, etc., the country will take action in these very few situations. It is Hong Kong’s own responsibility. If you don’t want to have a second round of speculation, you shouldn’t do anything.

Hong Kong version Guoan Faliang Zhenying Tan Yaozong Wu Qiubei Tan Huizhu I at home 01 Video