The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

[Minato National Security Act] Can I use another way to love Hong Kong?

2020-07-03T13:46:41.341Z


"We really love Hong Kong," Hong Kong-an hour before the 23rd anniversary of the return of Hong Kong, the "National Security Act" formulated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress was formally promulgated and implemented by the SAR Government;


weekly

Written by: Huang Yunna

2020-07-03 19:00

Last update date: 2020-07-03 19:00

"We really love Hong Kong," Hong Kong-an hour before the 23rd anniversary of the return of Hong Kong, the "National Security Act" formulated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress was officially promulgated and implemented by the SAR Government; some people rushed to handle immigration, some people rushed While busy renewing the BNO, some people also chose to scream out their love for Hong Kong in a way that only Hong Kong people understand during the July 1 march under the National Security Law. On the tramway off the North Sea Centre in Wan Chai, there was a large straight streamer printed with the words "We really love Hong Kong", which has caused countless citizens to express their emotions-just because of love, even if they are afraid, they have to go to the street; so, they do not want to Let her sink, even more unable to pull away.

Some people say that this love is the last cry of Hong Kong people who are about to "fall into depravity" after the anti-revision laws have passed. It cannot be untouchable, but it cannot be said to be unduly heavy—for the sake of love, countless Hong Kong people are facing the scorching sun, blocking the wind and rain, and taking to the streets again and again, trying not to make Hong Kong look like another; but also Also for love, countless young people took risks and resorted to extremes. One after another, violent conflicts gradually turned Hong Kong into another look.

On July 1st, someone on the tramway off the North Sea Centre in Wan Chai marched on the street and raised a large straight streamer. (Photo/Photo by Luo Guohui)

We love her rule of law, but we rely on a large number of people to overthrow the established decision-making mechanism of society, and even test the law and attack the rule of law; we love her bravery, but we have the courage to succeed, but did not show the peace of the people. "Send the lead"; we love her unity, but we are entangled in the "color struggle", pushing Hong Kong to an unprecedented tear; we love her prosperity, let us settle down, but we threaten to "scramble", want her Come to "burial."

There have been different ways of love in the world, but this year, it seems that only this "simple and rough" way is love that is recognized. However, just like parents who never understand the thoughts of their children, and like a couple who can't always understand each other's thoughts, this deep, this vigorous, seems to have no place for Hong Kong. When we think we have done everything, we can get the return of the love we ask for, such as democracy and freedom, but the result is the price of tearless love, which damages a high degree of autonomy.

One violent conflict after another has gradually turned Hong Kong into another look. Do we really understand what kind of love Hong Kong needs? (Photo/Photo by Li Zetong)

Actually, do we really understand what kind of love Hong Kong needs? When we want Hong Kong to become a better Hong Kong, do we know what kind of Hong Kong is a better Hong Kong? After the glory of the golden age, she has long had thousands of holes, economic single industry, difficult transformation, brain drain, uneven distribution of people's livelihood, disparity between the rich and the poor, and stagnation of high; we know that this is caused by the corruption and distortion of capitalism Disaster, but we wishfully indulged in the binary opposition of ideology, thinking that democracy and freedom is the panacea of ​​Hong Kong, and ignoring fairness and justice is the basic premise of good governance-but, looking at the world, "fairness and justice" does not Born with "democracy and freedom", it turned into a blank check by populist politicians, causing social toss.

Who is not a "twist like Hong Kong"? But since love, why do you want to destroy whenever you are dissatisfied and then turn around and leave? And since love, why not calm down and think about how to love is the best feedback to Hong Kong without harm?

More "Hong Kong 01" in-depth report articles:

[National Security Act of Minato City. Depth] How does the Hong Kong British "Political Department" work?

[Health code. Depth] Hong Kong's new crown test is expensive and rarely analyzes the three main reasons

Guishan Island Reclamation. Depth|The central government showed that the Hong Kong government was incompetent but it was difficult to solve the deep contradiction

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law. In-depth | The "National Security Committee" in Hong Kong and Macau is very different-the scope is wider and the functions are narrower?

[Hong Kong version of National Security Law. Depth] How does the National Security Council of Hong Kong learn from the "Macao Model"

[Hong Kong version of National Security Law. Depth] How does Macau complete Article 23 of the Basic Law?

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law|Liang Meifen urged to complete 23 articles as soon as possible.

[Second Reading of National Anthem Law. Depth] An article to see the true and false issues of the legislative dispute-prejudice or excuse?

History Section. Depth|Thinking about the national consciousness from the debate of test questions-what kind of Hong Kong people did the colony cultivate?

01 depth

In-depth coverage of the Hong Kong version of the National Security Act March and March Social Movement

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-07-03

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-07T08:05:51.578Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.