07/29/2020 - 20:15
- Clarín.com
- Politics
After the announcement by President Alberto Fernández in which he sent the bill for judicial reform, on social media they called a cacerolazo that was heard loudly on Wednesday.
The saucepans were heard in Buenos Aires neighborhoods such as Palermo, Belgrano, Villa Urquiza, Colegiales and Villa del Parque. But it was also heard in some Buenos Aires districts such as Olivos and Banfield, Lanús and San Martín.
" No to the judicial reform due to Cristina's impunity. Wednesday, the 29th cacerolazo 20 hs. Pass it. It is serious. Let's react. Argentina united in the Republic, freedom and against Cristina's impunity," said the call.
#NoALaReformaJudicialK #ReformaJudicial #Cacerolazo we are fed up !!!!! #Palermo #CABA pic.twitter.com/TuJHMrBNzN
- Antonio Perez (@antonioperezAR) July 29, 2020" It is serious, let's react. Argentina united in the republic, freedom, and against Cristina's impunity," narrated another of the invitations that circulated on Twitter.
The demonstration comes after the announcement by Alberto Fernández and the rejection of Juntos por el Cambio, which in a statement opposed the reform.
#Cacerolazo #cacerolazonacional https://t.co/oaQxpMrYXN
- jeer brii (@jeerbrii) July 29, 2020"We oppose the increase in the number of members of the Supreme Court, it must be a stable institution over time," affirmed the leaders of the opposition, Mauricio Macri, Horacio Rodríguez Larreta, María Eugenia Vidal, Patricia Bullrich, Cristian Ritondo and Humberto Schiavoni for the PRO, Alfredo Cornejo, Mario Negri, Luis Naidenoff and Martín Lousteau for radicalism, Maximiliano Ferraro, Juan López and Maricel Etchecoin for the Civic Coalition and the Peronist Miguel Pichetto.
" The stability of the highest court is a value in itself, which safeguards the independence of the Judiciary, legal certainty and ultimately the democratic quality and the institutions of our Republic," was drafted at the beginning.
"They are not a priority for citizens concerned about anguish and evident deficiencies in economic, social and security matters," they argued in another section of the text.
Then they questioned the commission and elaborated on that point: "The objective is clear: to create one more instance in the federal criminal justice system, to continue prolonging cases, to issue annulments, dismissals or any other judicial resolution that guarantees impunity ."
In the end, they ratified that they will seek to block the Government's initiatives in Congress: “Opposing the expansion of the Supreme Court also obviously implies opposing the invitation to propose candidates and facilitate two-thirds of the votes in the National Senate. for their eventual integration ”.