"Allopolitics" is a former champion in present-day politics. He must not be confused with the facts: Netanyahu is guilty in the submarine affair. And when the prosecution, the hostile arm of Netanyahu, could not find a shred of evidence against him (trust her that if she had found, she would have been celebrating it in the criminal track), he recruits the permanent list of officers.

With many funds of secret and unknown origin, more than the secrecy that should have surrounded the submarine affair, huge ads are published in their name, in amazing sync with the demonstrations, demanding the opening of a commission of inquiry against Netanyahu.

The signed officers are mostly recognized; From awareness of sovereignty, through withdrawals from Gush Katif, to support for Palestinian partners to continue negotiations for a Palestinian state despite incitement and terrorism.

In the face of the well-funded political demand, the time has come to echo the words of a line of security personnel, with a glorious combat past who do not believe that Netanyahu sinned in the submarine affair.

Here is a partial list: Here is Minister Yoav Galant, Commander-in-Chief of the Southern Command and former commander of the naval commando, confronting Ya'alon's claims that attacked the business: In submarines. "

MK Avi Dichter, a General Staff patrolman, head of the GSS and former chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee: "The publications on the subject try to cast doubt on the prime minister's considerations and the IDF's discretion and cause a terrible injustice to his commanders. The allegations that no serious process was carried out on the issue are completely unfounded, and there is no connection between them and reality. "

Maj. Gen. (Res.) Yaakov Amidror, head of the National Security Council until 2013, says that he is the one who demanded six submarines from Netanyahu after examining the strategic and economic data, and that Netanyahu actually reduced the number to three submarines.

MK Maj. Gen. (Res.) Uzi Dayan, former commander of the General Staff Reconnaissance Squadron, Maj. Gen. General and Deputy Chief of Staff, in an interview with Network B: "Already during my time as chairman of the National Security Council, in 2000, we believed that six submarines were required To reach nine. "

Even former chief of staff Ganz said in January 2018, long before joining Netanyahu: "I am convinced, from what I know at the political level, that there was no corruption in this affair."

There was indeed a real controversy in the security systems around the issue of submarines, as in other security issues. Were related to it economic aspects and aspects of strategic external relations. The former chairman of the National Security Council, Dr. Yaakov Nagel, once said candidly that "although the defense establishment knew about the purchase of the submarines, the defense establishment's position is given a lot of weight, but it is not always decisive. "Iron Dome was launched, contrary to the opinion of the defense establishment."

General Amidror previously explained that there were several times when the army's position was different and the National Security Council determined otherwise. He added to the issue of submarines that there were disagreements in the army itself. This is not the first time that the National Security Council has formulated a position contrary to the position of the army. Its role is to include the approaches of all security arms: the army, the Mossad and the GSS, and political elements. To this end, the senior officers were also placed there.

Even if the army does not like it, this is the role of the National Security Council in the law. Since the Second Lebanon War, tasks have been added to it: "To present alternatives ... to prepare the staff's work for discussions on the various security bodies' budgets." In the face of a nuclear attack from Iran, to be a counter-threat or a neutralizing factor of the attack, it is appropriate that whoever decides and prepares the strategic answer is the highest echelon - the Prime Minister, with the Prime Minister, the National Security Adviser to the Prime Minister, advising.

It is not appropriate to expand on the issue, so as not to serve the enemy who enjoys for free the information that has flowed and still flows to him, at the irresponsibility of those who brought the issue to the media. However, in the controversy that has arisen around the submarines, against the background of the Iranian threat that it exists to the country, it is appropriate that the decision will come out of the hands of the prime minister.

Some objected or were offended that they were not listened to. But the prime minister should not be accused of corruption. It is certainly not appropriate to take such a sensitive strategic security issue and get its skin in the market in front of all our enemies.

The demand for a commission of inquiry is political, not to mention populist, and is the last we need now here in the Jewish state. We must not give in to the trolling of the state and the people, when we have to focus on Iran and the north, and on the epidemic that is raging within us.