Meghan Markle sued the British newspaper "Mail on Sunday" for breach of her privacy and lost the trial. For the first time, a judge is now issuing spicy details about the Duchess
- Meghan Markle * and her defeat in court: she had accused "Mail on Sunday" of violating her privacy
- According to her friends' statement : This judgment has now been announced
- Judge Mark Warby with spicy details in his judgment: Meghan is said to have given information himself
Los Angeles / London - Meghan Markle * does not speak well in the British tabloid press after her lawsuit at the latestagainst the newspaper publisher and editor of the British newspaper "Mail on Sunday" and "Mail online" , Associated Newspapers Limited . The reason for this lawsuit was the publication of a letter to her father Thomas Markle (76). As Gala now reported, the inspection of the court documents of this process reveals further exciting details that Meghan's team is said to have passed on to the Royal reporter Omid Scobie . The judge's assumption about this information is astonishing.
To protect her friends: Meghan Markle complains and comes under suspicion
After the agitation of the Boulveard press againstDuchess Meghan *Five close friends of hers contacted her for the first time in 2019 to protect the 39-year-old from the media and to defend her. They commented on the "People" at the time and "Meg has been silent for a long time and has endured the lies and untruths. We are concerned about what that will do to her and her baby. It is wrong to expose someone to this level of emotional trauma, to leave him alone while he is pregnant, "she quoted the People at the time. To protect her friends from similar incidents, Meghan filed a new motion in the course of the lawsuit on July 9, 2020 in the High Court in London , with the Concern to protect the identity of five of her friends from the public.
Judge Mark Warby has his own guesses and details about the trial
For the time being, the names of Meghan's * five trusted people may be mentioned by the "Mail on Sunday", so judge Mark Warby decided this week in Meghan's favor. In his judgment, Warby also mentions "that there are indications that the Duchess's side" should have informed the media vigorously about this procedure from the start. "The reason for this assumption is a Twitter post by Royal reporter Omid Be a scobie . He reported on the morning of July 9th on Meghan's application in court after it had been there for just 58 minutes. “The bottom line is that he [Scobie] was provided with a copy by representatives of the applicant [Meghan Markle] . That seems very likely, ”he continues in his judgment. ( mrf ) * Merkur.de is part of the nationwide Ippen digital network .
Explosive new book about Harry and Meghan's royal exit. @scobie, co-author of #FindingFreedom, gives our @DebRobertsABC an inside look at the couple's side of the story. https://t.co/X8P82x9Dsv pic.twitter.com/L9fkvvAPGA
- Good Morning America (@GMA) August 10, 2020
