The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

With crosses on the attorney Eduardo Casal, the ruling party removed the representatives of the jury of the Public Prosecutor's Office

2020-08-27T21:52:12.772Z


They had been appointed during the management of Cambiemos. The ruling party also wants to displace the attorney general.


Jasmine Bullorini

08/27/2020 - 16:46

  • Clarín.com
  • Politics

With the discussion around the attorney general Eduardo Casal - whom Kirchnerism wants to remove - as a backdrop, the Frente de Todos approved this Friday in the Senate, the displacement of the representatives of the Senate in the Court of Prosecution of the Public Prosecutor's Office , where the ruling party analyzes initiating a jury against Casal.

They are the titular member, Mario Laporta, the substitute Juan Simoni and another titular Felipe Ricca, who had already requested the resignation. All three had been appointed during the management of Cambiemos.

Without a two-thirds majority to be able to advance in a political trial against the interim attorney Eduardo Casal, or to appoint the candidate for the Executive, Daniel Rafecas, the ruling party is analyzing the possibility of dismissing Casal through a jury through the Court of Prosecution of the Public Prosecutor's Office. Hence the relevance of how this court is composed.

" We want to normalize the irregularity that (Gabriela) Michetti committed by designating them in an illegal and arbitrary manner, " said the official senator Martín Doñate, who pointed out that the appointments were made by decree of the former vice president and that they should have been voted on in The enclosure.

However, he also stated that "the Public Ministry is a swarm of irregularities." More than 3 years ago we had an interim prosecutor, who became one of the most radicalized militants of Together for Change, as Laura Alonso was in the Anti-Corruption Office” and stated that there is “a new law that establishes that whoever he must fill the position is a district attorney. " "But Casal suspended all the district attorney contests," he said.

From the opposition, the president of the Juntos por el Cambio interblock, Luis Naidenoff, retorted. "We have no doubt that this attack has to do with the idea of ​​putting pressure on Justice , the attorney Casal who annoys them, and having a Prosecution Court that responds to their interests," he stated and assured that in 2017 and 2018 " none of the senators now challenging the mechanism objected to the appointments. "

“If they want to put a prosecutor there will be time to discuss it and they have to have the numbers as the law says. But it bothers them because they don't have the numbers, don't look for the shortcut of taking Casal off the court " , Naidenoff insisted and added:" Or do you forget that when we govern we present one (Inés Weinberg de Roca) and they didn't even treat it . But don't do this bullshit of displacing, squeezing, intimidating "

"We have no doubt that this attack has to do with the idea of ​​putting pressure on Justice, the attorney Casal who bothers them, and having a Trial Court that responds to their interests," said the head of the Juntos por el interbloque Change, Luis Naidenoff and assured that in 2017 and 2018 "none of the senators who are now challenging the mechanism objected to the appointments."

“If they want to put a prosecutor there will be time to discuss it and they have to have the numbers as the law says. But it bothers them because they don't have the numbers, don't look for the shortcut of taking Casal off the court ", Naidenoff insisted and added:" Or do you forget that when we govern we present one (Inés Weinmberg de Roca) and they didn't even treat it . But don't do this bullshit of displacing, squeezing, intimidating "

SJF

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-08-27

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-13T04:52:24.694Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.