It's an old debate.
In each episode Relief corporate taxation, economists, politicians and other associations demanding, according to immemorial rule "
eye for eye, tooth for den
t
"
, this action was subject to conditions.
In return, companies benefiting from public funds must in turn embark on the path of the common good, by promising to hire and better pay their employees, etc.
Classically, the executive in place refuses to do so, arguing that these new measures (essentially reductions in employer contributions since the end of the 1980s) do not aim to give a "gift to the bosses", but precisely to support employment. .
Hindered by counterparts, tax cuts could miss their goal, argue their designers.
Read also:
Recovery plan: the debate swells on the counterparts to aid for companies
The discussion opposes, to simplify, on the one hand those who believe in a certain efficiency of market mechanisms and in the responsibility of the actors and, on the other, the defenders of the administered whole.
She was revived by the
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 58% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
Enter your email
Already subscribed?
Log in