The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Brexit: Boris Johnson's explosive law in Parliament

2020-09-14T18:28:55.869Z


The draft text on the internal market goes back to part of the commitments made to the EU.It feels like a few months back, when rebel Conservative MPs stood up against Boris Johnson's attempt to get Parliament out of the Brexit game. Today, faced with the Prime Minister's desire to cheat the EU withdrawal agreement, other Tory parliamentarians want to once again impose a “parliamentary lock” on it. Same methods of forcible passage, same reaction in Westminster, same legal and political


It feels like a few months back, when rebel Conservative MPs stood up against Boris Johnson's attempt to get Parliament out of the Brexit game.

Today, faced with the Prime Minister's desire to cheat the EU withdrawal agreement, other Tory parliamentarians want to once again impose a “parliamentary lock” on it.

Same methods of forcible passage, same reaction in Westminster, same legal and political guerrilla warfare ...

Read also:

Brexit: Boris Johnson partially renounces the commitments made with the European Union

The explosive draft "law on the internal market", which aroused indignation both inside and outside, began its parliamentary course on Monday.

It is the members of the House of Commons who examine it first, until next Tuesday, before it passes to the Lords.

To show the

"crucial"

importance

of this text, Boris Johnson himself came to open the debates.

He showed no sign of easing, on the contrary.

The Prime Minister claimed that this law was a protection against any attempt

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 75% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

Enter your email

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2020-09-14

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.