Guido Carelli Lynch
09/29/2020 - 16:29
Clarín.com
Politics
In the Government, silence prevailed during the first hours after the Supreme Court's decision to accept the per saltum and decide on the fate of judges
Pablo Bertuzzi, Leopoldo Bruglia and Germán Castelli
, the magistrates who investigated Cristina Kirchner and whose transfers , ordered by
Mauricio Macri
, were revoked by the Senate.
In the Casa Rosada they maintain that during the afternoon the Minister of Justice
Marcela Losardo
will refer to the ruling.
In the Justice Portfolio for now they indicated that there was no decision made in this regard.
On Monday Losardo had been categorical about the possibility that the Court would agree to deal with the displacement of the judges.
"If the Court enabled the per saltum and decided that they remain in their places it
would be a scandal
, it would enable what is not wanted to be done, that the Executive transfer judges," he said in statements to Futurock.
The uncertainty about the substantive ruling that is in the hands of the Highest Court dominates the main actors of the ruling party.
The news from the Court surprised President
Alberto Fernández
, who had publicly questioned the head of the Court
Carlos Rosenkrantz
, in Rosario, where he announced the investment of $ 3 billion in security matters.
"The Court is far away," they explained without haste near the president who was preparing to take up his office in the Government House in the afternoon.
In the most important offices of the Rosada, last week, they discounted that the Supreme Court would endorse the decision of the
Chamber of Cassation
that gave the green light to the presidential decrees that validate the decision of the Senate.
The Court's ruling clearly represents a setback for the Executive, which would have preferred a rejection of the appeal presented by Bertuzzi, Bruglia and Castelli.
However, some judicial swords of the ruling party in Congress, who respond to
Cristina Kirchner
, believe that this reason is what allows the ruling party to be deluded with a final decision that benefits it.
“There is still an open ending, although I would dare to say that they are going to reject it, because the logic of the Court is to make a deal.
In this case, it is a favorable decision by the judges, but in the fundamentals I find some clue that this is going to turn out well for the Government ”, expressed a leader of fluid dialogue with the vice president.
It refers, in particular, to the entire ruling, considering number six of the Court's resolution, which speaks of the "unusual institutional" gravity that concerns the ruling and the alleged
loneliness of Rosenkrantz
, which, according to the same source, is evidenced in the resolution, and of which there had already been evidence in previous rulings in which the head of the highest court could not impose his criteria.
"He is
more alone than ever,
" official leaders close to the President had pointed out.
The judgment of the Court suspends the replacements of the judges who were advancing in the Council of the Magistracy.
In the ruling party they are excited about an
imminent
ruling
on the
merits of the highest Court, next Tuesday
, to correct this resolution and validate the replacements of the magistrates.
Along the same lines, Congressman
Eduardo Valdés
, very close to the President, criticized the ruling and pointed out the media, but was optimistic about a Court ruling.
"It surprises me (the ruling). The media pressure derived from these mobilizations has achieved this. But it seems to me that the result is going to be not accepting (the claim of the judges) and they will have to return to the original court," he said in an interview with C5N.