The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Supreme Court revives restriction on vote by mail in South Carolina

2020-10-06T23:23:44.082Z


Democrats wanted the requirement suspended due to the coronavirus pandemic, but Republicans defended it, claiming it prevents fraud.


By Jessica Gresko - The Assocciated Press

The Supreme Court on Monday reinstated the requirement that South Carolinians who vote by mail in this year's presidential election have

a witness

when signing their ballots.

Democrats tried to stop this requirement due to the coronavirus pandemic, but Republicans defended it, claiming that this measure would prevent fraud.

Voters in South Carolina have already begun submitting their ballots, even as the Court reinstated this restriction.

More than

200,000 absentee ballots

have already been mailed

and 18,000 have been returned, according to the state electoral commission.

[Follow our coverage of the 2020 presidential elections]

The Court said that votes that were already cast before Monday's decision, and received within two days after this order

"cannot be rejected for not meeting the witness requirement."

South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Drew McKissick applauded the decision.

"Despite the efforts of Democrats to take advantage of a pandemic, and use it to meddle in our electoral laws, they lost," he said in a statement.

"We are pleased that the Supreme Court has reinstated the requirement for a witness signature and recognized its importance in helping prevent voter fraud."

How prepared is the United States for voting by mail in this presidential election?

July 25, 202001: 57

Meanwhile, the leader of the Democratic Party in that same state, Trav Robertson, expressed his disappointment.

"Our hope is that

no one catches COVID-19 by trying to find a witness.

We are disappointed, but the elections have consequences," he said in a statement.

South Carolina has been asking for witnesses for absentee voting

since 1953.

Under current law, voters who mail their ballots take an oath printed on the return envelope confirming that they are eligible to vote and that the ballot inside it is yours, among other things.

The oath has to be witnessed by another person who has to sign under the voter's signature and write their address.

[How can I vote by mail?

Am I in time to register?

What you should know about these elections]

State and national Democratic Party organizations and several individual voters condemned the requirement pointing to the pandemic, and other parts of state election law.

In fact, a judge blocked the witness requirement before the state primaries in June.

Colorado judge stops sending vote-by-mail notices

Sept.

13,202000: 28

After the primaries and the response to the pandemic, state legislators made changes to the state's electoral law, including

allowing all residents to vote absentee in November.

But they left the requirement of witnesses in place.

[This is what Donald Trump and Joe Biden propose for the United States to win the presidency]

District Court Judge J. Michelle Childs, appointed by President Barack Obama, stopped the requirement for witnesses for this presidential election late last month, claiming this 

may increase the risk of some voters contracting the virus

and is demanding let other already infected voters take the risk of exposing witnesses.

About

a dozen states

require vote-by-mail ballot envelopes to be signed by one or more witnesses or a notary.

Source: telemundo

All news articles on 2020-10-06

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-06T04:45:48.582Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.