LE FIGARO.
- You passionately defend in your book the taste for secrecy, and its corollary, the ability to keep a secret.
Are they not obsolete in the age of social networks and transparency?
Hervé TEMIME.
-
Obviously, but it's a shame.
First, because the mystery is irreplaceable.
And that nothing seems more vulgar to me than to display permanently and in the eyes of everyone the details, even the most banal of its existence.
How sad, and what a joke in spite of oneself, to post a photo of yourself in front of your cup of soy milk when you wake up, making the “V” for victory while holding gluten-free bread ...
Read also:
Have social networks killed the diary?
As for transparency, it is poorly understood.
The requirement of integrity of our public decision-makers to which I subscribe, which implies knowing their heritage and their links of interest, does not mean that everything must be transparent.
The right to know is not the right to know everything and certainly not about everyone.
Not only should this transparency
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 81% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
Enter your email
Already subscribed?
Log in
