The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Corona rules: Lawyer shoots Merkel and Söder - "Don't let me lock me up at home"

2020-10-20T11:04:30.453Z


“I won't let Söder lock me up at home,” says lawyer Stephan Vielheimer. At the same time, he corrects what he sees as a widespread misunderstanding of the Infection Protection Act.


“I won't let Söder lock me up at home,” says lawyer Stephan Vielheimer.

At the same time, he corrects what he sees as a widespread misunderstanding of the Infection Protection Act.

  • In the fight against

    Corona

    *, a lawyer shoots against the line of the

    Federal Government

    of

    Chancellor Angela Merkel

    *.

  • He also

    does not give

    Bavaria's Prime Minister

    Markus Söder

    * a good report - he particularly resents a “euphemism” to the

    CSU *

    boss

    .

  • He justifies his criticism in the

    world

    interview with the

    Infection Protection Act

    .

Munich - There has been a lot of dispute in the past few days about a

ban on accommodation

and a

general curfew

.

In several federal states, courts have

finally overturned

the

corona measures

.

A Munich lawyer accuses politicians of

"atypical measures"

in the fight against a

second wave of

the pandemic *.

“With the accommodation ban, the state does not prohibit any behavior that it considers

directly

dangerous.

In truth,

travel

is supposed to be

made more difficult and spoiled -

without

directing this

.

Nobody seriously claims that spending the night in the hotel itself represents a relevant corona risk - at least that does not follow from the study on the infectious

environment of

the

Robert Koch Institute (RKI), "

says

Stephan Vielmeier

, who specializes in labor law,

in an interview with the newspaper

Welt

.

Criticism of corona measures by the federal government: "Is not about maximum infection protection"

After the federal-state consultations with

Chancellor Angela Merkel * (CDU *),

Vielmeier misses

a "coherent overall concept".

In this context, he judges the

Infection Protection Act

to be “sleek” - only for the

immediate averting of danger:

“What critics often keep silent: The general clause in sentence 4 explicitly allows encroachment on freedom of assembly, freedom of movement and inviolability of the home,” he explains in the interview the content of the Infection Protection Act.

But now that Corona *

has become

a

permanent state

, it is not the executive, but the

legislature that is

asked: "According to the Basic Law, it is not about maximum protection against infection, but the best possible protection against infection while at the same time protecting other legal interests, such as the rights of children, to be trained. "

+

Several administrative courts have overturned the ban on accommodation that was passed after the federal-state consultations with Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU).

© KENZO TRIBOUILLARD / POOL / AFP

Coronavirus in Germany: case law on the Infection Protection Act in sight

As far as the previous case law on the Infection Protection Act is concerned, Vielmeier (who emphasized in the course of the conversation that he was not an administrative lawyer himself) praised the

German courts

: "The judiciary was initially very generous with the executive and always took into account that the executive

as of March / April had

little knowledge and had

to act quickly

. "

Corona in Germany: Lawyer hands out against Söder - "Don't let me lock up"

Despite this admission to politics, Vielmeier, who has already taken the

Bavarian courts

because of corona measures

, does not

spare

criticism.

For example, the

CSU chief and Bavarian Prime Minister

and initially imposed

curfews

in the Free State (for frequent Heimer, a "euphemism"):

"I do not let myself Markus Söder locked up at home."

Lawyer rebukes Corona policy: "I will not let Markus Söder lock me up at home" https://t.co/h1wMYJlQKA pic.twitter.com/Qo1jdXUmj8

- WORLD (@world) October 18, 2020

The city-wide ban on

alcohol consumption

in Munich, decided by

Mayor

Dieter Reiter

, was, in Vielmeier's opinion, “not necessary”: “A lonely night-time beer in the Isar floodplain next to my office only endangers my liver, but not protection against infection.

Conversely, the

special drinker

and

shisha smoker was allowed

to stay seated.

That doesn't fit in the back and front, there is no overall concept. "

His conclusion on the Bavarian approach to combating corona: “Fundamentally wrong”.

Because: "The ban on safe behavior is unsuitable." In this context, he also doubts travel restrictions in Germany, a ban on serving from 10 p.m. and a curfew.

Is the corona mood in Germany changing?

Lawyer is certain: "Yes"

Does Vielmeier also have constructive criticism?

In his opinion, which corona measures should be retained?

The lawyer counts:

  • Minimum distance

  • no major events

  • Limitation of gastro visitors ("especially in closed rooms")

  • Mask requirement ("city-wide no, maybe yes in the pedestrian zone")

Since new pandemic rules have been devised every “week”, the population's approval for them has waned, believes Vielmeier - and they also have to be enforced.

"Allegedly, according to surveys, the approval of the corona measures is so high, but everyone makes their rules very selectively in practice," he warns.

(frs)

* Merkur.de is part of the Ippen-Digital editorial network.

List of rubric lists: © Kay Nietfeld / POOL / AFP

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2020-10-20

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T20:25:41.926Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.