The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Demolition | Why does Lam Cheng have a soft spot for Lantau tomorrow? Guishan Island "hedging" is not in time

2020-10-20T18:15:56.738Z


Since the launch of Lantau Tomorrow, there has been constant controversy and has never withdrawn from the public eye. The Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, has re-exported by accepting media interviews a few days ago. If it is not possible to reach the countryside, he needs this reclamation plan. The most expensive large-scale infrastructure project in Hong Kong's history is about to start. Why does Lam Cheng have a soft spot for Lantau tomorrow? This huge project, which has been criticized by the democrats for "pouring money into the sea," has not received a low level of backlash among the people. How does Lam Cheng still stubbornly fight during the low popularity? According to the establishment, the former capital wants to leave one or two "famous works" during his tenure, so that he can be named in Hong Kong history. Tung Chee-hwa has the "85 thousand" housing project, the West Kowloon Cultural District, and Tsang Yinquan has "doors". The government headquarters is always open, and the ten major infrastructure projects. Leung Chun-ying has "Hong Kong people and land" and free early childhood education. The most likely "representative work" of Lam Cheng's achievements is tomorrow's Lantau (of course, there will be a controversy with amendments, if the negative version Also included). Therefore, she regards tomorrow's Lantau as her "baby" and hopes to protect her and nurture her "grown-up" so that she can "have a future" in her political achievements.


Political situation

Written by: Luo Kunyi

2020-10-21 02:09

Last update date: 2020-10-21 02:09

Since the launch of Lantau Tomorrow, there has been constant controversy and has never withdrawn from the public eye. The Chief Executive, Carrie Lam, has re-exported by accepting media interviews a few days ago. If it is not possible to reach the countryside, he needs this reclamation plan. The most expensive large-scale infrastructure project in Hong Kong's history is about to start.

Why does Lam Cheng have a soft spot for Lantau tomorrow?

This huge project, which has been criticized by the democrats for "pouring money into the sea," has not received a low level of backlash among the people. How does Lam Cheng still stubbornly fight during the low popularity?

According to the establishment, the former capital wants to leave one or two "famous works" during his tenure, so that he can be named in Hong Kong history. Tung Chee-hwa has the "85 thousand" housing project, the West Kowloon Cultural District, and Tsang Yinquan has "doors". The government headquarters is always open, and the ten major infrastructure projects. Leung Chun-ying has "Hong Kong people and land" and free early childhood education. The most likely "representative work" of Lam Cheng's achievements is tomorrow's Lantau (of course, there will be a controversy with amendments, if the negative version Also included).

Therefore, she regards tomorrow's Lantau as her "baby" and hopes to protect her and nurture her "grown-up" so that she can "have a future" in her political achievements.

After Hong Kong experienced the "anti-amendment legislation" storm, Lam Cheng's governance methods have been questioned. The new crown pneumonia epidemic that followed has severely damaged Hong Kong's economy and further shook the prestige of Lin Cheng's administration.

The public is deeply dissatisfied with the Hong Kong government's ineffectiveness in fighting the epidemic. Even if the anti-epidemic fund has been launched for support, the deficit this year has reached 300 billion yuan, and the measures have been approved with loopholes and helpless people's livelihood.

All signs reflect that the policies criticized by Carrie Lam during his tenure are "a dazzling array", but there are no specific political achievements that can "leave a name in history."

When people’s livelihood anxiety continues to accumulate and will be out of control, housing and land issues are undoubtedly the most prominent, most urgent, and most criticized among the many problems to be solved. If Lin Zheng can successfully overcome the "epidemic cycle" during his tenure "Tomorrow Lantau to support the economy and pioneer the solution to the land problem will be the key to whether she can be positively evaluated in the future.

Therefore, tomorrow Lantau will become Lam Cheng's policy "little baby", and it may also be the only life-saver she can grasp at the moment.

+2

+2

+2

Because of Lam Cheng's "preference" for Lantau tomorrow, the direction of two policies will be influenced. One is the Guishan Island project and the other is the transitional housing plan.

During her visit, Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor reiterated her determination to open up land and emphasized that based on the central government’s conservation policy, she believed that she would not be allowed to reclaim the land in the Mainland. She even stated that she had not heard the central government talk about reclamation on Guishan Island, which is equivalent to denying the feasibility of the plan. Sex.

Some people in the political circle firmly stated that Beijing must have been actively studying the Guishan Island project and hoped to relieve Hong Kong’s land shortage dilemma through the relevant plan. However, it has been indecisive and undecided. The so-called "one mountain cannot hide two tigers", the Guishan Island project There is a "substitution" between Lantau and tomorrow. If the former succeeds, the necessity and urgency of the latter will be greatly reduced. This political achievement "baby" has a very high chance of premature death. Therefore, Lam Cheng has always resisted the Guishan Island plan.

Lam Cheng publicly denied the Guishan Island plan. This move is precisely to sever all the "illusions" of the establishment. He hopes that someone will recommend the "Guishan Island Blueprint" to Beijing, and this is also an indirect attitude to Beijing.

There is a saying in the political circle that under the "anti-revision regulations," Carrie Lam appeared helpless, causing Beijing to personally "manipulate" the formulation of the "Hong Kong National Security Law" for Hong Kong.

Since then, the central government has apparently reorganized its strategy of governing Hong Kong, intending to help resolve deep-seated contradictions in Hong Kong's economy and people's livelihood, so as to ease civil political grievances, and has begun to participate highly in promoting the Hong Kong government to resolve Hong Kong's economy and people's livelihood.

If Beijing took the initiative at this time to use Guishan Island to increase land supply for Hong Kong and solve the housing problem, it would be equivalent to reflecting the truth of the Hong Kong officials’ inaction and slamming the Hong Kong government as mediocrity. Of course, Lam Cheng did not like to see this happen. .

+2

+2

+2

Since Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is determined not to be on Lantau tomorrow, she seems "reasonable and reasonable" when she has been intensively studying the transitional housing policy in the past year.

Transitional housing has been gradually declining in Hong Kong’s housing policy, but in Lam Cheng’s policy address, it has become the "new favorite" to solve the housing problem of Hong Kong people, and it has been featured in the book.

The government announced earlier that the goal of providing 10,000 transitional houses within three years has found enough land, so it will "add another 5,000".

After all, no matter how many more transitional houses are built, they are only "transitional" and cannot really alleviate the housing problem in Hong Kong in the long term. Under the main theme compiled by the Hong Kong government, the demand for Lantau tomorrow will always exist. Even Hong Kong cannot live without Tomorrow Lantau.

The government submitted to the Legislative Council this year the preliminary research funding for tomorrow’s Lantau-related projects, which could not be completed during the current session of the Legislative Council, and had to "turn over and start over."

However, due to the postponement of the Legislative Council for one year, the funding proposal will then have a chance to "regenerate", and the Finance Committee can continue to review the unfinished funding.

Judging from Lam Cheng's attitude, it is imperative to push Lantau tomorrow.

Lam Cheng points out that Kwai Shan Island does not comply with the conservation policy. Yin Zhaojian criticizes the contradiction and points out that Lantau also ignores environmental protection

Lam Cheng said that his determination to open up land is undiminished: If we do not develop country park wetlands, we will need Lantau tomorrow

Yin Zhaojian criticizes the Hong Kong government for "pathological gambling" tomorrow, Lantau Lu Weiguo: No reclamation of Guishan Island

Lam Cheng: I feel hard about the problem of land creation and criticize some people for fighting against tomorrow's Lantau Island, which is better than Guishan Island reclamation

Tomorrow Lantau | Solidarity Hong Kong Fund Advocates As soon as possible to hand over the finance meeting to discuss Ye Wenqi: You must walk on two legs

Lantau Tomorrow|Solidarity Fund advocates 6 financing model "Land Flower" and other mixed development

Policy Address 2020|The Democratic Party opposes tomorrow's Lantau and overseas votes to urge the government to return $10,000

Finance Plus Zero One Essence|Chen Hengbin proposes to submit to the URA for research and tomorrow Lantau Legislative Council will avoid pre-trial funding

Political rumors | The establishment of the system advocates drawing out the preliminary funding of tomorrow's Lantau to reform the URA to study the government's hard work

01News

Carrie Lam's land problem on Lantau tomorrow

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-10-20

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-04T08:07:23.172Z
News/Politics 2024-04-04T08:07:03.212Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.