The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Alfredo Leuco's harsh criticism of the judge who ruled against the eviction in Entre Ríos

2020-10-24T10:56:45.422Z


The journalist repudiated Raúl Flores's notification to prohibit the former Minister of Agriculture, Luis Miguel Etchevehere, and his family from speaking in the media and approaching the seized field.


10/24/2020 12:13 AM

  • Clarín.com

  • Politics

Updated 10/24/2020 12:19 AM

The journalist Alfredo Leuco launched a harsh criticism against the deputy judge of La Paz, Entre Ríos,

Raúl Flores,

who rejected the precautionary measure presented by the former Minister of Agriculture Luis Miguel Etchevehere to remove the militants of the social leader Juan Grabois from the family field taken.

Who the hell is Judge Raúl Flores

to prohibit someone from speaking in Argentina?

Previous censorship, a surrogate judge? ", Launched the radio host, in relation to the controversial notification of the magistrate who ordered the Etchevehere family not to speak in the media or approach the establishment.

In his program

I give you my Word

on

Radio Miter

, Leuco reiterated: "Who the hell is this judge to prohibit a person from speaking,

or do we not live in a democracy?

Are we all crazy?

They are advancing at a redoubled pace

. Gentlemen, the Democracy and the republic are increasingly in danger. Who wants to hear, let them listen. "

"Democracy and the republic are increasingly in danger", warned Alfredo Leuco.

Through his Twitter account, the former head of the Argentine Rural Society announced that the judge "has just notified my mother, my brothers and me that, as of this moment,

we cannot make radio or television statements nor by social networks

that disturb the usurpers. "

The surrogate magistrate decided not to accept the precautionary measure presented by Etchevehere, which had been endorsed by prosecutors Oscar Sobko and María Constanza Bessa, to stop the occupation of the "Casa Nueva" farm in Santa Elena, Entre Ríos.

"We have just received the ruling. It is very rare. The judge rules that he will not decide the eviction based on his family law training, since he has no knowledge of criminal law. In addition, he recommends that the brothers have a meeting and that let us reconcile. The truth is that we are surprised, "said the ruralista at the door of the disputed field.

"We are not talking about a family discussion, but about a criminal offense involving a group of 40 people who usurped property. The prosecutors themselves interpreted the seriousness of the case," he added.

"We are not talking about a family discussion, but about a criminal offense, they usurped property," he warned.

Luis Miguel Etchevehere.

Photo Juan José García

The field, in the northeast of Entre Ríos, was usurped on Thursday of last week by a hundred adherents of the

Movement of Excluded Workers (MTE)

of Grabois, who acts as lawyer for Dolores Etchevehere.

Both announced the "Artigas Project", which would develop gardens and other agro-ecological productions in that field.

On Wednesday evening, progress had been made in a conciliation hearing and the protesters who had arrived at the place since the morning assumed that the judge, meeting with the parties in La Paz -departmental head-,

would issue the order to evict the occupants

, as requested by the former Minister of Agriculture and the prosecutor of the case.

Dolores Etchevehere claims to have valid inheritance rights, in contradiction to what her mother and siblings affirm, who argue that she has already received her share and has no financial ties with them since 2018.

This Friday, a group of Entre Rios producers mobilized in front of the La Paz judicial headquarters to protest against the ruling.

"They crossed a limit, they

attack private property and also our freedom

. Now we can't even speak," questioned the protesters, among whom were not the Etchevehere brothers, who stayed outside the field.

aerial view of the Etchvehere family field where a protest was held.

Photo: JUAN JOSE GARCIA

Together for Change also came out to repudiate the shots and accused the Government of being an accomplice: "The only victims are the usurped ones."

Through a strong statement, they criticized the Executive's inaction regarding "a crime that is spreading everywhere."

Look also

What grounds did the judge give to reject the eviction from the Etchevehere camp

15 years ago, Dolores Etchevehere and her husband took the field of "Don Segundo Sombra"

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-10-24

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.