"We have to accept that we are at war."
Invited on the set of the Grand Jury RTL-Le Figaro-LCI, this Sunday, Marine Le Pen adopted the most martial of tones, a week after the terrorist attack in Conflans-Sainte-Honorine:
"We must declare this ideology, the Islamism, enemy of France and a whole series of decisions stemming from it. "
Besides banning organizations that promote this ideology, such as funding that supports it.
In addition to pleading for the closure of mosques which preach it, the expulsion of foreigners who support it and to strike with national indignity the French people who adhere to it, the president of the National Assembly called once again for the adoption of a
" war legislation ”
against Islamism.
.
"We must reestablish a state security court, magistrates specialized in combating Islamism trained to endure the pressures, obviously special measures in the penitentiary plan, such as specific penal legislation."
And this, not against terrorism alone, as the law already provides, but against Islamism as such.
“The mistake that has been made for years is to fight only against terrorism,
she defended.
However, terrorism is the weapon that is used by this ideology.
What I want is that we fight against those who arm terrorists, those who defend their totalitarian ideology. "
To read also: Decapitated professor: the RN calls for force and sulks tributes
"Time of war" obliges, the head of the RN seems to have abandoned her clothes of systematic opponent, to reiterate her desire to carry out
"constructive work"
with the government on the future law against Islamism.
Text that all RN deputies should vote, although they consider it as
"completely insufficient"
.
“One step is better than zero.
Even if you have to do 1000, ”
summarizes Marine Le Pen.
Likewise, the president of the RN said
“support”
the head of state in the face of repeated attacks by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan against him.
As she had already defended in the 2019 European elections, the declared presidential candidate for 2022 once again pleaded for France's disengagement from certain articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (CEDH) in sovereign matters and immigration.
"It prevents us from protecting ourselves from terrorists or removing them from the territory and obliges us to grant them rights to family life which poses a major concern in terms of the protection of peoples",
she justified.
To read also: Pascal Bruckner: "It is a declaration of war which must be treated accordingly"
Before investigating the process of complicity towards Islamism of different forces of the political spectrum,
"whether they are leftist or Islamic rightist"
, without however naming them.
"There is a whole series of elected officials, and not the least, who have compromised in relations with Islamist fundamentalism for purely electoral reasons
," she joked.
Subsidizing the UOIF, granting Salafist mosques emphyteutic leases for one euro, this is what has been done for 30 years in our country by elected officials from both right and left.
I haven't heard a single mea culpa. ”
Invited to react to the word
"collabo"
tagged on Saturday evening on the dome of the headquarters of the French Communist Party, Marine Le Pen refused to denounce the gesture, stressing that
"should not be surprised today by this reaction , can be outrageous, but which is based on a real reproach that we can make to the left. "
The president of the National Gathering has once again pleaded for the ban of the veil in public space.
Practice which, according to her,
"is not the choice of women to cover their heads but a way for the Islamists to work for a visual appropriation of space."
While recalling his conviction
"that there is no religion incompatible with the Republic [...] but ideologies, yes."
Asked at the end of the program on the second wave of Coronavirus which crosses France, Marine Le Pen wanted to be somewhat defeatist, without taking up arms against the government:
"When we took decisions too late, that the 'we haven't planned anything, it's too late to take them. There are irreparable situations [...] I am not sure the curfew is effective. I do not dispute the decisions that are made, the government governs. What I am asking is to ensure that when this curfew is exited, there are no restaurateurs who are shutting down. ”
