The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Unexpected lack of Pope Francis in a meeting with social movements organized by Juan Grabois

2020-10-26T21:18:04.054Z


His absence occurred just when the social referent is questioned for endorsing the Etchevehere family's takeover of the field.


Sergio Rubin

10/26/2020 5:44 PM

  • Clarín.com

  • Politics

Updated 10/26/2020 5:44 PM

For the first time, Pope Francis did not participate this weekend in a meeting - the fourth - of the social movements organized in conjunction with the Vatican, which due to the pandemic had to be held via Zoom.

The

absence

attracted special attention because the virtual appointment was opened by Juan Grabois in his capacity as a reference for the Union of Workers of the Popular Economy of Argentina.

Strictly speaking,

the most striking thing is that the absence

occurred at a time when Grabois is being highly questioned, especially for endorsing that members of his group participate in the occupation of a field by the Etchevehere family in Entre Ríos, the center of a dispute. family that is settled in court, which sparked a wave of protests from ruralistas and criticism of entities that group them.

The Vatican did not inform about the reason for the failure to an appointment that the Pope gives special importance, despite the fact that, unlike the other calls, the presence of the pontiff was not necessary, but his participation was only required by teleconference with a message that he could eventually have recorded at a time that his schedule allowed.

March of the Artigas group against the Etchevehere family, this Monday in Entre Ríos.

Photo Juan José García.

In his welcoming remarks, Cardinal

Michael Czerny

, on behalf of the Vatican's Ministry for the Integral Development Service, invited those present to ask themselves the five questions expressed in the recent social encyclical by Francisco Fratelli Tutti (All Brothers) on human fraternity. and social friendship, which seemed to come very relevant.

“How much love did I put into my work?

How did I advance the people?

What mark did I leave in the life of society?

What real ties did I build?

How much social peace did I sow?

What positive forces did I unleash?

What did I provoke in the place that was entrusted? ”, He questioned and pointed out that the meeting was part of the“ culture of the meeting ”that Francisco fosters.

Francisco - who spoke at the first meeting of social movements held in 2014 in the Vatican, in 2015 in Santa Cruz de la Sierra (Bolivia) and in 2016 again in the Vatican - considers that this is a sector that emerged from exclusion social and that not only demands their insertion, but also

promotes work alternatives that facilitate it

.

In the encyclical he says that with them “integral human development will be possible, which implies overcoming that idea of ​​social policies conceived as a policy towards the poor, but never with the poor” and points out that “what is truly popular - because it promotes good of the people - is to assure everyone the possibility of making the seeds that God has put in each one, their capacities, their initiative, their strengths to sprout ”.

Grabois established a fluid relationship in Buenos Aires with the then Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio, who appreciated his work in the field of popular economy to the point that already as Pope he appointed him consultant to the now defunct Justice and Peace Council of the Vatican (he was replaced by the ministry at the Service of Integral Human Development), but his mandate expired two years ago, without being renewed.

In the ecclesiastical circles it is considered that over the years Grabois

was politicizing his actions

and complicating the pontiff.

In fact, in January 2018, after some very strong statements by him about then-president Mauricio Macri, the Episcopal Conference - which brings together the hundred of the country's bishops - clarified "no one has spoken or can speak on behalf of the Pope."

Poster in Entre Ríos.

There are not a few who in the Church believe that the Episcopate

should

now

reiterate

the clarification before the controversial position of Grabois on the land seizure and the participation of his movement in the occupation of the Etchevehere field, knowing that it is not typical of a pontiff go out and do this type of clarification, much less with first and last name.

Look also

Entre Ríos: in the midst of a strong police operation, militants of Juan Grabois marched to the field taken from the Etchevehere family

Axel Kicillof rushes a solution for the shooting in Guernica: is the Grabois model applied?

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-10-26

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.