The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

371 new violations of the Saudi aggression in Al-Hudaydah, Yemen, within 24 hours

2020-11-05T17:17:40.989Z


Sana'a-SANA The Saudi aggression forces have renewed their violation of the ceasefire agreement in the Yemeni province of Hodeidah, executed 371 others


Sana'a - Sana

The Saudi aggression forces renewed their violation of the ceasefire agreement in the Yemeni governorate of Hodeidah, carrying out 371 new violations during the past 24 hours.

Al Masirah Net quoted a source in the Liaison and Coordination Officers Operations Room to monitor the violations of the aggression in Hodeidah as saying that "the aggression forces' violations included flying 10 spy planes in the airspace of Al-Duraimi, Al-Jah, Al-Jabaliya and Al-Tuhayta, and two drone strikes on Tuhayta."

The violations also included 99 violations with rocket and artillery shelling, and 260 violations with various bullets.

The Yemeni parties had reached during their talks in Sweden on the thirteenth of December 2018, a ceasefire agreement in the Hodeidah governorate and understandings regarding the city of Taiz, but the forces of the Saudi aggression and its mercenaries continue their violations and violations of this agreement.

In addition, the Saudi aggression launched a number of raids today on the governorates of Ma'rib and Al-Jawf, causing severe material damage to public and private property.

The Saudi regime has continued its aggression against Yemen since March 2015, using various types of weapons, which has led to the death and injury of tens of thousands of civilians and massive damage to the infrastructure.

Source: sena

All news articles on 2020-11-05

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-10T22:08:00.317Z
News/Politics 2024-03-27T07:56:25.580Z
Sports 2024-04-04T15:58:21.859Z
News/Politics 2024-04-07T09:03:55.340Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.