The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Infidelity in 104 cases - ex-bank employee is sentenced to suspended sentence

2020-11-07T13:09:33.303Z


A former bank employee was charged with misappropriating money first in the local court, then in the regional court. A final judgment has now been made.


A former bank employee was charged with misappropriating money first in the local court, then in the regional court.

A final judgment has now been made.

+

Only the judgment at the regional court became final.

(Symbol photo).

© dpa

Waakirchen -

A former employee of the Waakirchner Sparkasse branch is said to have embezzled around

130,000 euros

between 2013 and 2016

.

This allegation was heard last year before the lay judge's court in Miesbach (we reported).

On September 13, the Gmund woman was sentenced to two and a half years in prison.

But the woman on the other hand lay

vocation

one.

The lawyer for the then 51-year-old had previously questioned the credibility of the witnesses.

Suspended prison sentence

The case went to the next instance and was

heard at the Munich District Court II

.

There was now a final judgment.

"The defendant was

sentenced to two years

' imprisonment, which was suspended," said press spokesman Florian Gliwitzky when asked by our newspaper.

Judgment is final

The court could

prove

infidelity to Gmund in

104 cases

.

She was

initially

accused of

over 200 cases

.

“Therefore

, 61,660

euros will be

confiscated

from the defendant

as compensation

,” Gliwitzky reported.

The judgment of the Munich regional court has been final since September 17th of this year.    

nap

In the course of the negotiations, a former colleague of the defendants took the stand.

List of rubric lists: © dpa

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2020-11-07

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-13T10:02:28.055Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.