The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The AstraZeneca and Oxford vaccine returns to the testing phase due to a scientific error that raised doubts

2020-11-28T02:42:06.451Z


"This was a very lucky mistake," says one expert, "sometimes the experiments don't go as you expect." But this may delay the coronavirus vaccine that created the most expectations for its price.


Pharmaceutical AstraZeneca and the British University of Oxford will resume testing its coronavirus vaccine to be more certain about its efficacy, after initial results raised doubts due to a scientific error. 

In the partial findings, announced Monday, it was indicated that the vaccine had an average 70% effectiveness against COVID-19: it was a mean between just over 60% protection for those who received two full doses and 90% for patients who received 

a half dose first and a full dose in the second inoculation.

These differences have surprised and confused experts because it is rare that there is a better immune response when less product is given. 

In addition, the University of Oxford said Wednesday that the half dose was initially not given on purpose: it was the result of a manufacturing problem that over-diluted certain ampules.

Afterwards, the protocol was changed to do the test taking into account the lower concentration.

But fewer patients received the half dose, a

small

group 

of people, especially young people, who may not be representative 

of how the entire population that uses the vaccine will respond. 

"Now that we found that it would be more effective [to give half a dose first], we need to evaluate it and 

that requires an additional study

," the director of the pharmaceutical company, Pascal Soriot, told the Bloomberg news service on Thursday.

The AstraZeneca and Oxford vaccine is of special global interest because it is the 

cheapest alternative of those that are being developed

, so if it receives regulatory approval it is the option that more countries could afford to protect their population.

"This was a very lucky mistake," Nicola Stonehouse, a professor of molecular virology at the University of Leeds, told NBC News.

"It's an experiment and sometimes the experiments don't go as you expect," he added, "sometimes things are unexpected.

But they found out what happened, and that's called good experimental science. "

But Stonehouse cautioned that

only a summary of the results has been released

so far

, not the full data

, and that rigorous scrutiny by regulators will be necessary to ensure the results do not undermine public confidence in the global effort to vaccinate. to billions of people.

With information from NBC News.

Source: telemundo

All news articles on 2020-11-28

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.