The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Key setback for Cristina Kirchner: the Cassation Chamber rejected her appeal and endorsed the Repentant Law in the Cuadernos case

2020-11-30T22:19:24.840Z


The court rejected a request from Cristina Kirchner and thus confirmed previous sentences that support the work of Judge Bonadio and Prosecutor Stornelli. The case has 31 regrets.


Lucia Salinas

11/30/2020 1:39 PM

  • Clarín.com

  • Politics

Updated 11/30/2020 1:41 PM

Despite the insistent statement of the defenses of several former Kirchnerista officials, to whom the legal advice of Cristina Kirchner was bowed,

the Chamber of Cassation resolved that the Law of the Collaborating Defendant is constitutional

.

The discussion was fought within the framework of the cause known as the Cuadernos de las Bribes, where the main accused is the vice president.

In this way, the status of the 31 regrets in the case was validated and

a hard blow was dealt to strategy K to turn the case over.

The case in which Cristina Kirchner is processed and sent to oral trial as head of an illicit association that was dedicated to the collection of illegal funds, has 31 accused collaborators.

It is, according to the Justice, the biggest "corruption scandal of the last 20 years".

In addition, never a case had so many repentants.

This is precisely what various lawyers who represent former Kirchner officials sought to delegitimize.

The discussion focused first on

how the Law was applied

, since the testimonies were not filmed and recorded.

The articles of the regulation speak of suitable technical means, something that lent itself to various interpretations.

For the prosecutor Carlos Stornelli,

the minutes signed by the accused and their respective lawyers were enough.

Then came the homologation instance before Judge Bonadio, who in twelve months took for proven the sayings of the repentant.

However, the defenses of Julio De Vido and the businessman Gerardo Ferreyra, among others, stressed that the collaboration certificate was not enough to support the sayings of the repentant.

They still suspect

if those confessions were not addressed or under duress.

They went further and argued directly that the law was unconstitutional.

That is why the discussion reached the Chamber of Cassation.

The decision is

a huge blow to the vice president

and her former officials accused of the bribery system that would have functioned regularly under previous K governments.

News in development

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-11-30

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-06T00:05:31.306Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-17T18:08:17.125Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.