The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Chantal Delsol: "The freedom to educate, an expiatory victim of our inability to fight Islamism"

2021-01-15T19:25:55.034Z


TRIBUNE - In the name of the fight against "separatism", the government is planning a virtual ban on homeschooling. However, this freedom was guaranteed by law since 1882. A sectarian republicanism turns its back on the liberal spirit which has characterized school laws since ...


It was in the name of the fight against

"separatism"

that President Macron first announced the end of home schooling, to finally allow it under new, drastic conditions.

His worried speech reflects the difficulty of facing Islamism, and the need for radical measures.

It is to be feared that parental freedom to educate is the expiatory victim of the inability of republican secularism


to fight a conquering religion.

An opinion deliberated by the general assembly of the Council of State in its session of December 3, 2020, recalls that the law of 1882 guarantees the right


for parents to choose the type of education and instruction to be given


to their children. including by choosing methods other


than those of the public school system, and including through instruction within the family.

To read also:

Chantal Delsol: "Caricatures, distinguishing law and morality"

The right left and guaranteed to parents to decide on the education of their children represents the primordial and cardinal right which protects us from any drift towards

This article is for subscribers only.

You still have 86% to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

I ENJOY IT

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2021-01-15

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-09T20:08:00.879Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T09:29:37.790Z
News/Politics 2024-04-18T11:17:37.535Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.