Paul Melun is a strategy advisor and essayist. He recently published, with Jérémie Cornet,
Les enfants de la déconstruction.
Portrait of a youth in rupture
(ed. Marie B., 2019).
Puffed up by the Pyrrhic victory over President Trump, the ayatollahs of gender theories seem more determined than ever to bring the blow to the ruins of the old world.
In France, the emissaries of deconstruction, this hegemonic school of thought since May 68, are hard at work to complete their plan: to challenge nature and erase history.
Read also:
Frédéric Rouvillois: "The urgency of (re) reading and celebrating Roger Scruton"
A few weeks, after this Christmas that President Macron did not deign to wish the French, the theories of the genre are making a comeback.
On television first, with a prime time of the magazine Zone Interdite on M6 with the evocative title, “
Neither girl nor boy: investigation into a new genre
”.
For a little over an hour and a half, the show oscillates between testimonials from “
non-binary
”
adolescents
(understand, neither man nor woman), and “
experts
” according to whom gender is only a construction. social.
According to the magazine, 22% of young people between the ages of 18 and 30 do not feel that they are either girl or boy in France.
The theme of "
non-binarity
" continues to create controversy in France.
At the beginning of the week, the SNCF was blacklisted by the collective "
stop homophobia
", on the grounds that it would question its passengers on their gender, asking them to decide between male and female.
The collective initiated a legal action on Monday, January 11, accompanied by a press release denouncing the obligation for travelers to "
conform to outdated gender stereotypes
".
According to the said collective, the SNCF is guilty of excluding "
people who identify as non-binary, especially among Trans or Intersex people, 'genderfucks', Queers, (...) or even those who want to end it with the patriarchy and its gender police
”.
Like a false advertisement, gender theories offer the prospect of a society where the choice is entirely up to individuals.
These absurd claims would remain anecdotal, if the progressive elites had not seized upon them to impose them as norms on the whole of society.
The choice to make theories of the genre the flagship of progress is not innocent, and even constitutes the backbone of a future dehumanized civilization.
By claiming to free beings from the yoke of ancestral domination, the theories of deconstruction do the exact opposite.
Like false advertising, gender theories offer the prospect of a society where the choice is fully up to individuals, where each is the master of their own destiny.
In their world, neither nature, nor chance, nor death can hinder the absolute freedom of the individual king.
The human being of the 21st century is obsessed with himself.
Thanks to the technique, he can modify his entire body envelope, and monetize it on social networks, like throwing a package of laundry.
Read also:
Ecology: when catastrophism paralyzes political action
To propagate this soon-to-be hegemonic model, the leaders of deconstruction rely on three unstoppable tools.
The first is hypersensitivity, which makes it possible to oppose to intellectual contradiction an attitude of extreme fragility, on edge, which can lead to bursting into tears in the face of the opinions of others.
This method breaks the relationship of equality in the debate by instilling the idea of an executioner and his victim.
The second instrument, like the controversy against the SNCF, is illustrated before the courts, it is the judicialization of ideas.
Gender theorists use the judge to win debates, which they would undoubtedly lose on a purely intellectual level.
The third tool, widely used in the magazine of M6, consists in soliciting impostors draped as scientists.
Here too, the method comes to us from American campuses where
gender
“
laboratories
” use the codes of scientific communication to profess militant and baseless speeches.
Amateurs of medical TV series, the young generation of followers of Judith Butler, rely on rigged studies and an anachronistic reading of history, to defend hazy concepts like non-binarity.
The individuals of the 21st century will have to be non-binary, interchangeable, their bodies will be a facade that we transform ad infinitum.
Unfortunately, this school of thought cannot be reduced to its inconsistency.
If the cultural struggle, fought by the theories of the genre is so powerful, it is because it foreshadows the future of the West.
The joint ambition of the deconstructors and the globalized elites is to prepare humanity for its transhumanist turn.
The prophecy addressed to us today is crystal clear.
The individuals of the XXIst century will have to be non-binary, interchangeable, their bodies will be a facade that one transforms to infinity. The superman of this new civilization will no longer seek otherness, but similitude. If we are not careful, it will only be a paroxysmal version of the myth of Narcissus, wasting away in front of his dismal reflection.
/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/prisa/KMEYMJKESBAZBE4MRBAM4TGHIQ.jpg)
