If the government wanted to avoid seeing the discussion on the law on "republican principles" polluted by the epidermal question of the veil, it has failed.
He was able to prevent certain amendments from being placed on the agenda;
he could not prevent the political debate.
And the resources of the procedure will not be enough to close it.
Read also:
Separatism law: in their amendments, the Marchers expose their nuances
In parliamentary jargon, this is called a “cavalier”, that is, a provision that is too far removed from the purpose of a bill.
The Constitutional Council is accustomed to tracking down this process by which a minister seeks to shoot everything to advance, or a deputy seeks to exist.
Authors of two amendments aimed at banning the veil for young girls, Aurore Bergé and Jean-Baptiste Moreau were the first to be aware of this.
The “inadmissibility” opposed to them by the special commission chaired by François de Rugy did not surprise them.
But a detached grenade is never thrown without consequence in the public debate.
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 71% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in
