The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"Am I rather skeptical": LMU professor criticizes RKI - and shares alarming observation

2021-01-31T21:41:14.089Z


A statistics professor answers “lateral thinkers” theories on excess mortality with a clear no - but also has advice to the Robert Koch Institute.


A statistics professor answers “lateral thinkers” theories on excess mortality with a clear no - but also has advice to the Robert Koch Institute.

  • In the debate about

    excess mortality

    , an important factor is overlooked, says a Munich statistician.

  • Therefore, he joins a prediction by the virologist

    Hendrik Streeck

    .

  • On the other hand, the development in

    Saxony is

    "blatant" - the Federal Statistical Office is also irritated.

Munich - "If the RKI had visualized the data correctly, it would have been immediately clear what was really happening in Germany": The statistician and LMU professor

Göran Kauermann

expressed his

dissatisfaction with the authority

in a

world

interview.

"The fact that the

infection

curve shot up

among the elderly

despite

lockdown

was only

revealed

through

statistical finger exercises

," he explained his allegation.

“We

once presented

the RKI data

graphically differently.

That was profane. ”His frustration does not only

affect

the

RKI *

, but also the

data quality

in Germany in general, which he described as the

“ only catastrophe ”

.

Munich professor criticizes RKI: "In view of the data quality, I am skeptical"

When asked whether increasingly younger people are

dying

from

Covid-19

, he replied to the newspaper: "In view of the data quality of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), I am rather skeptical that we will ever come to meaningful

analyzes

.

We would like to investigate, but there is no

age information

for intensive care patients

.

The same goes for the

mutants

.

Or the

test

. "

Excess mortality due to Corona?

Professor from Munich sees Streeck's prognosis confirmed

Another topic in the conversation was

excess mortality

due to Corona *.

"According to our calculations, not unexpectedly more people died than the average of the four years before," he said - confirming an earlier prognosis by the virologist

Hendrik Streeck

.

How can that be when the Federal Statistical Office reports 48,000 more deaths than in the period 2016-2019?

According to Kauermann, a question of

interpretation

- because you have to take the age structure into account.

Today's

80-year-olds

were born in a particularly high birth rate and the higher death rates were therefore to be expected.

The

"lateral thinker" movement

, from which claims come that there are even fewer dead, countered Kauermann: "There is nothing to it." He already expressed his doubts about excess mortality in the

BR

:

Corona in Saxony: "Even without Covid-19 an excess mortality of 50 percent"

Nevertheless,

more deaths are a challenge

for the

health system

- and Kauermann shared an alarming observation in the interview: “In recent weeks, especially in East Germany, there has been

massive excess mortality

, in

Saxony it is

currently almost 100 percent, i.e. it has

doubled

.

It is striking that even without the Covid-19 deaths there is an excess mortality rate of 50 percent. "

His research team (the "Corona Data Analysis Group" at LMU) was repeatedly contacted by those affected from the state who reported that

relatives infected

with

Sars-CoV-2

in

nursing homes

remained without medical help and died, according to Kauermann, and stated: "In any case, something is wrong, that is clearly reflected in the figures." The observation was passed on to the Federal Statistical Office.

"They were irritated there too," he told the

world

.

(frs)

* Merkur.de is part of the Ippen-Digital editorial network.

Source: merkur

All news articles on 2021-01-31

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.